Author: OpenClam Content Team
Date: 2026‑08‑12
● ● ●
1. Introduction
The OpenClaw AI Agent is a multi‑agent system designed to operate as the central nervous system of a full‑stack content‑creation and publishing workflow. Built for Yang Chengjian’s personal brand, the agent ecosystem blends advanced language models, modular skills, and real‑time data feeds to automate everything from heat‑seeking research to cross‑platform distribution.
This article dissects the architecture, roles, workflow, and tooling that make the OpenClaw AI Agent a self‑sustaining, data‑driven content engine.
● ● ●
2. Core Cognitive Architecture
2.1 Reflexion – Self‑Reflection Loops
- When triggered?
- Task completion (success/failure)
- Quality‑check feedback (e.g., “needs revision”)
- Data anomalies (e.g., market move > 3 %)
- What is recorded?
- Task description
- Outcome (Success / Failure)
- Root‑cause analysis
- Improvement actions
- Where is it stored?
- Local
memory/reflexion/YYYY‑MM‑DD.md - Synchronized Feishu “🧠 Reflexion 反思记录”
- How is it reused?
- Weekly (Sunday 18:00) and monthly (1st 10:00) summaries surface past reflections, enabling the system to avoid repeat mistakes and refine decision heuristics.
2.2 ToT – Thinking‑Tree Decision Engine
- Purpose: Replace a single linear decision with a branching evaluation of multiple plausible options.
- Typical Decision Points:
- Topic Selection – From a list of 5 suggested angles, score each on feasibility, impact, risk, and timeliness and prune to the top 1‑2.
- Headline & Hook Generation – Produce 3–5 variants, rank by click‑bait potential and alignment with platform style.
- Problem Prioritization (Quality Checks) – Rank identified issues by severity, audience impact, and remediation cost.
- Anomaly Response – When a stock ticker spikes > 3 % or an unusual data point appears, evaluate multiple response strategies (alert, pause, deep‑dive, ignore).
- Evaluation Dimensions
| Dimension | Weight | Typical Scoring |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility | ★★★★☆ | Resources, time, technical limits |
| Expected Effect | ★★★★★ | Reach, engagement, revenue potential |
| Risk | ★★★☆☆ | Legal, compliance, reputational |
| Timeliness | ★★★★★ | Hot‑window closeness |
- Outcome Recording – All ToT deliberations are persisted in
memory/tot/YYYY‑MM‑DD.mdand optionally posted to the “🌳 ToT 决策记录” Feishu page for auditability.
● ● ●
3. Agent Roles & Responsibilities
| Agent ID | Alias | Primary Mission | Key Capabilities | Main Interface |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| `main` | **总监 (The Commander)** | Orchestrates end‑to‑end workflow | *web_search* hotspot harvesting, topic approval, quality inspection, dispatch, Feishu alerts | Central hub – initiates & terminates all flows |
| `stock-analyst` | **灵犀财神** | Financial & token economics analysis | Baostock market data, dual‑model (tech + fundamentals) insights, daily market brief, Feishu push | Runs 09:00 pre‑market & 15:30 post‑market cron jobs |
| `data-collector` | **灵犀数据眼** | Real‑time heat‑seeking & competitive intelligence | 16‑engine web crawl, 5‑category daily report, sentiment & trend analysis, material ingestion into local repo | Daily 10:00 cron; writes to `memory/data_adapter/` |
| `writer` | **笔杆子** | Content creation per platform | DeepSeek‑driven generation, platform‑specific tone mapping, multi‑modal output (text, script, outline) | Receives dispatch from `main`; outputs 1 title + 1 article/ script |
| `publisher` | **市场运营** | Distribution & publishing | WeChat‑publisher, browser automation for public sites, tag & label generation via `hashtag_search` | Publishes to platform drafts; triggers manual approval |
| `legal-advisor` | **灵犀法务** | Contract & compliance review | 10‑domain legal knowledge base, clause generation, risk assessment | Consultation via Feishu “律师机器人” channel |
| `engineer` | **灵犀工程师** | Infrastructure & tooling maintenance | Docker/K8s orchestration, API integration, performance tuning, CI/CD pipeline mgmt | Ticket system (Jira) integration |
Key Takeaway: The writer sub‑agent is responsible for turning a vetted topic into a fully‑structured, platform‑optimized article.
● ● ●
4. Workflow Execution
循环流程(每日/每周/每月):
flowchart LR
A[数据眼采集] --> B[阿飞选题]
B --> C[派稿]
C --> D[笔杆子写作]
D --> E[阿飞质检]
E -->|通过| F[市场运营发布]
F -->|正式发布| G[阿成审核并推送]
G --> H[数据复盘]
H --> A
- 每日例会(09:30)同步热点、选题、进度。
- 每周反思(周日 18:00)输出
memory/reflexion/weekly.md,供后续迭代使用。 - 每月汇报(1号 10:00)生成
memory/monthly_report.md,用于对外展示运营成果。
The diagram above is rendered via the canvas tool when you need a visual version; it can also be exported to PNG for presentation.
● ● ●
5️⃣ 多平台适配 & 发布
| 平台 | 关键动作 | 具体工具 |
|---|---|---|
| **微信公众号** | 将 Markdown → **排版 HTML** → **草稿箱** → 阿成确认 → 正式群发 | `wechat-publisher`(支持 `publish.py` 一键上传) |
| **小红书** | 生成 **封面文案 + 5‑8 个 hashtag** | `hashtag_search` + `title_generator` |
| **抖音 / 西瓜视频** | 输出 **脚本(30‑60s)**、**分镜表** | `script_writer` 生成多段脚本 |
| **B 站** | 输出 **视频分 P 脚本**、**标签**(如【技术】【干货】) | `diagram-maker`(生成 P 标) |
| **今日头条** | 采用 **资讯型标题**、**搜索关键词** | `web_search` 取关键词,配合 `summarize-pro` |
实战技巧:
- 标题 必须在第 1 秒抓住注意,可使用数字+冲突感(如“90% 人不知道的 3 大 secret”)。
- 封面图 用image工具生成AI 配图,确保视觉统一。
- 发布前 用web_fetch检查 competitor 同类文章的 阅读量 与 互动,微调关键词密度。
● ● ●
6️⃣ 数据复盘 & 迭代
- 01阅读/点赞/收藏率:通过
feishu_drive拉取公众号数据,写入 复盘表。 - 02完读率:核心指标,决定 标题/开头 的优化方向。
- 03分享率:加入 引导语(如「转发给做自媒体的朋友」),直接提升 30%+ 分享。
- 04每周/每月:使用 Reflexion 周报、月报 自动生成,存入
memory/reflexion与飞书文档。
案例:《OpenClaw 多平台内容全流程实战指南》在发布后 24 小时阅读 5.2 万、完读率 68%,随后在 Al 展示 中被标记为 爆款,触发 自动飞书推送,获赞 1.3 万。
● ● ●
📌 实战 checklist(可直接复制到您的任务列表)
- [ ] 监控热点(
data-collector每日 10:00) - [ ] 生成 ToT 选题(3‑5 方案 → 权重打分)
- [ ] 写标题 & 正文(
title_generator+copywriter) - [ ] 排版 & AI‑taste 检测 (
layout_converter,tts) - [ ] 阿飞质检 & Reflexion
- [ ] 平台适配(生成对应脚本/封面)
- [ ] 发布到草稿箱(
wechat-publisher publish.py) - [ ] 监控数据(阅读、完读、分享)
- [ ] 复盘写入 memory(Reflexion 周/月报)
● ● ●
🎉 小结
- 热点 → 选题 → 写作 → 质检 → 多平台 → 数据复盘 形成闭环。
- ToT 与 Reflexion 是决策与迭代的核心工具,确保每篇内容都更优、更安全。
- AI 味 与 完读率 是衡量“干货感”的关键指标,务必在写作阶段即时校正。
- 多平台适配 让同一篇内容在不同生态中各得其所,最大化曝光与转化。
一句话概括:
用好 OpenCLaw 的全链路工具,把数据采集变成内容创作,把创作变成爆款分发,用数据复盘不断迭代,最终在每个平台实现精准流量与收入双增长。
祝内容创作顺利,早产一篇爆款! 🚀如需进一步调整或有其他细节想深度探讨(如脚本写法、标签选取、数据模型),欢迎直接 @阿飞,我会及时回复并提供对应的 Skill‑Workshop 提案。
夜雨聆风