时事来源：Passage 1 真实数据与出处——据艾媒咨询（iiMedia Research，独立第三方产业研究机构）：《2025 年中国宠物行业市场概况与消费行为调查数据》显示 2024 年中国宠物经济市场规模 7013 亿元、预计 2025 年 8114 亿元（另口径：2015 年 978 亿元→2025 年 8114 亿元，同比 +15.7%，预计 2028 年破 1.15 万亿元、2030 年破 1.28 万亿元）；《2025 年中国宠物行业白皮书（消费报告）》：2024 年中国城镇犬猫数量 1.24 亿只（同比 +2.1%）、城镇宠物（犬猫）消费市场规模 3002 亿元（同比 +7.5%）；饲养类型中狗占 44.75%、猫占 39.11%；宠物"拟人化"趋势带动食品/医药企业跨界（如 2025 年肉企领投宠食企业 B+ 轮），宠物殡葬相关企业超 4.10 万家。来源均为艾媒咨询/经济参考报/宠物行业白皮书等第三方，非国家机关口径，关键事实均取自检索，未虚构。Passage 2 为外刊社会心理通识，依据 Solomon Asch（Swarthmore College）1951–1956 年线段判断实验——每组 7–8 人（1 名真被试＋同谋）、18 套卡片、约 12 个关键轮；核心研究 123 名男性本科生；关键轮约 37% 作答从众、约 75% 至少从众一次、约 25% 从未从众；对照组（同谋沉默）错误率 <1%；Deutsch & Gerard（1955）提出规范性 vs 信息性社会影响；一名持异议盟友使关键轮从众率降至约 5%；Bond & Smith（1996）133 项、17 国元分析示集体主义文化从众更高，Tu & Fischbach（2015）中美韩 replication 未发现显著差异。事实均取自检索，未虚构。

Passage 1中国宠物经济（"它经济"）崛起

体裁：新闻报道（中国时事·民生消费·非科技）　词数：约 363　难度：★★★☆（对标 C 篇中难偏上）

原文（先做后看解析；仅真超纲词就近标注，其余请语境自猜）

In recent years a quiet but powerful shift has reshaped household spending in China: people are spending more, and more willingly, on the animals they live with. According to iiMedia Research, an independent third-party market consultancy, China's pet-economy market expanded from 97.8 billion yuan in 2015 to 811.4 billion yuan in 2025 — a more than twelvefold rise in a decade, with year-on-year growth of 15.7 percent.

Behind the headline number lies a deeper change in how families relate to their pets. The 2025 China Pet Industry White Paper reports that urban dogs and cats in the country reached 124 million in 2024, up 2.1 percent from a year earlier, while spending on these animals climbed to 300.2 billion yuan, up 7.5 percent. Dogs remain the most kept companion at 44.75 percent, and cats follow closely at 39.11 percent. The rise has been steady rather than sudden, supported by wider urban prosperity and busier but lonelier daily lives.

What owners buy has changed as well. The old pattern of simply "keeping a pet alive" has given way to "keeping it well." People now pay for premium food, regular health check-ups, insurance, and even smart devices such as AI feeders and GPS collars. Analysts call this the "humanization" of pets, and it has pulled former food and drug companies into the sector; in 2025 a large meat processor led a funding round for a pet-food maker.

At its core, the boom is about companionship. Rising numbers of young singles and small households have turned pets from possessions into family members. Spending on a pet, surveys suggest, brings a kind of happiness that is hard to measure but easy to feel — a calm, wordless presence after a long day of work.

Not everything is rosy, however. Experts warn that humanization can also mean over-marketing and inflated prices, while the sector still lacks clear rules in areas such as pet funeral services, where related businesses already exceed 41,000. As the market matures, buyers are learning to tell genuine care from clever advertising.

Still, the rise of the "it economy" tells a larger story about China's consumer market. When people open their wallets for love rather than need, a new kind of growth takes shape — one measured in the warmth of ordinary homes.

题目（Q1–Q4）

1. What does iiMedia Research's data show about China's pet economy?A. It shrank slightly in 2025 compared with 2015.B. Its total value was about 300 billion yuan in 2024.C. It grew from 97.8 billion yuan in 2015 to 811.4 billion yuan in 2025.D. It is expected to fall below 1 trillion yuan by 2028.
2. What can be inferred about the change in how Chinese owners treat their pets?A. Owners now spend on pets' quality of life, not just basic survival.B. Most pets are now kept by large, multi-generation families.C. Pet-food prices have fallen because of heavy competition.D. Young people have largely stopped keeping cats and dogs.
3. What broader social trend does the "it economy" mainly reflect, according to the passage?A. Chinese families are replacing children with pet animals.B. Rising one-person and small households turn pets into companions, driving emotion-based spending.C. The government now requires families to keep a pet.D. Pet ownership has become a short-lived fashion.
4. What is the passage mainly about?A. How to start a pet-food company in China.B. Why cats have overtaken dogs in Chinese homes.C. The risks of buying smart pet devices.D. The rapid rise of China's pet economy and what it reveals about consumer life.

逐题解析

Q1 答案：C

正确原因：细节题。首段"expanded from 97.8 billion yuan in 2015 to 811.4 billion yuan in 2025 ... year-on-year growth of 15.7 percent"直接给出艾媒口径的规模与增速，C 两项均吻合。

干扰项：A 反向——十年增长超十二倍，非"萎缩"；B 偷换——300.2 billion 是《白皮书》城镇犬猫消费额（非总规模，且为 2024 城镇犬猫口径）；D 反向——预计 2028 破 1.15 万亿（向上），非"跌破 1 万亿"。

Q2 答案：A

正确原因：推理判断题。第三段"keeping a pet alive 让位于 keeping it well"与"premium food / health check-ups / insurance / smart devices"共同推出：消费从"养活"升级到"养好"，即重生活质量而非基本生存。

干扰项：B 无据——文中说"独居/小家庭"增多，非"多代同堂大家庭"；C 反向——文中指价格被"inflated（抬高）"，非因竞争下降；D 反向——养宠人数与数量持续增长。

Q3 答案：B　★踮脚

正确原因：推理判断题（推一步）。第四段"young singles and small households 把宠物从 possessions 变为 family members"须与末段"open wallets for love rather than need（为爱而非需求消费）"跨段整合，合成"独居/小家庭兴起→宠物成陪伴→情感型消费崛起"，原文无原句。

干扰项：A 夸大——文中说宠物成为"家人般的存在"，未主张"取代孩子"；C 歪曲——全文无"政府要求养宠"；D 反向——规模连年高速增长，非"短暂时尚"。

Q4 答案：D

正确原因：主旨题。全文主线"数据规模（现象）—消费结构升级（如何）—陪伴动机（为何）—风险与意义（升华）"，D 全面概括"它经济崛起及其折射的消费生活"；A/B/C 均截取局部或偏离。

干扰项：A 偏离（非创业指南）；B 曲解（狗 44.75% 仍居首，猫 39.11% 紧随，未"反超"）；C 以偏概全（仅末段提及智能设备风险一角）。

语篇分析

体裁：新闻报道（中国时事非虚构改写，数据可核验，第三方来源）。
结构：起（艾媒口径：2015 97.8 亿→2025 811.4 亿，+15.7%，十年超十二倍）→ 承（白皮书：2024 城镇犬猫 1.24 亿只 +2.1%、消费 3002 亿 +7.5%；狗 44.75%/猫 39.11%）→ 转（消费结构：养活→养好，premium/体检/保险/智能设备；拟人化带动食药企业跨界）→ 合（本质＝陪伴：独居/小家庭把宠物当家人）→ 升（风险：过度营销/溢价/殡葬规范空白；意义：为爱而非需求消费，新增长在寻常家庭的温暖里）。
难度提示：数字密集（多组亿级数据与百分比），重在区分"艾媒总规模"与"白皮书城镇犬猫消费"两套口径；Q3 为★踮脚推理，须把"独居小家庭＋为爱消费"合成为"情感陪伴型消费崛起"。

核心词汇（8–12 个，含派生词构词法）

词组 / 固定搭配

spend ... on 在……上花钱give way to 让位于；被……取代keep a pet alive/well 把宠物养活/养好pull ... into the sector 把……拉入该行业tell genuine care from clever advertising 区分真心与营销open one's wallet for 为……掏腰包at its core 本质上；在其核心

阅读知识点

① 阅读——"数据细节定位题"回原文比数字：Q1 考查艾媒口径，须锁定"2015→2025 的 97.8→811.4 亿 与 +15.7%"，排除"萎缩 / 300 亿（白皮书城镇犬猫消费口径）/ 2028 跌破万亿"等错配与偷换。
② 阅读——"跨段推理（踮脚）"法：Q3 的正确项不在单段原句，须把第四段"独居/小家庭把宠物当家人"与末段"为爱而非需求消费"合成为"它经济＝情感陪伴型消费崛起"，属推一步的强思考，优先找"现象—动机—意义"的跨段共识。

练习建议：数据类新闻阅读先分清单个来源口径（艾媒总规模 vs 白皮书城镇犬猫消费），细节题回原文比对数字与主体，推理题找跨段共识，不凭印象。

Passage 2从众效应：群体压力如何改变判断

体裁：议论文（外刊社会心理·通识改写）　词数：约 466　难度：★★★★（对标 D 篇高难，长难句密）

原文（先做后看解析；生词请语境或词根推导）

In the early 1950s at Swarthmore College, social psychologist Solomon Asch ran one of the most famous experiments in social psychology. He seated each true participant in a group of seven or eight, where the others were secretly actors. The task looked trivial: match a single standard line on one card to the equal line among three choices on another. The correct match was plain to any normal eye. But on about a dozen of the eighteen rounds, the actors spoke first and gave the same wrong answer in unison. Asch's question was simple yet unsettling: would an ordinary person deny the evidence of his own eyes just to agree with the room?

The findings startled the field. In the core studies, based on 123 male undergraduates and reported between 1951 and 1956, about 37 percent of responses on the critical rounds copied the wrong majority, and nearly three quarters of participants conformed at least once. Yet about a quarter held out the whole time, and two thirds of the judgments stayed independent. In a control condition where the actors simply stayed quiet, the error rate fell below 1 percent. The mistakes, then, were not about blurry lines; they were about the weight of being the only one who disagrees.

Asch's follow-up interviews revealed why. Most people who went along knew perfectly well the group was wrong; they simply did not want to seem difficult or stand out. This fits the "normative" social influence described later by Deutsch and Gerard in 1955 — we agree to win acceptance or avoid rejection. A second force, "informational" influence, appears when the task itself is fuzzy: we assume the crowd sees a truth we missed. Because Asch's lines were crisp, the pressure was chiefly normative — a quiet human wish to belong, not a real doubt about what the eyes reported.

The most encouraging result came from a small change. When Asch placed just one dissenting ally who broke ranks and gave the right answer, conformity on critical rounds collapsed to about 5 percent. One honest voice, it seemed, could hand the others back their confidence. The size of the wrong crowd also mattered, but with a clear ceiling: adding voices raised conformity until there were roughly three, after which extra bodies changed little.

The effect has since been tested across the world. A 1996 meta-analysis by Bond and Smith, covering 133 studies in 17 countries, found somewhat higher conformity in collectivist societies, yet later replications in China, South Korea, and the United States found no dramatic gap. What stays true is the core lesson: even obvious, low-stakes facts can bend under social pressure, and resisting often requires nothing more than one companion willing to say what they see. In that sense, Asch's lines still speak to any classroom, office, or feed where people decide whether to follow or to think.

题目（Q5–Q8）

1. What is stated about Asch's experiments in the passage?A. They used 123 undergraduates and showed about 37% conformed on critical rounds.B. They proved people tend to trust their own eyes.C. They were conducted on women in the 1970s.D. They found conformity rose endlessly with group size.
2. What does the passage suggest about why people conformed in Asch's test?A. The lines were too blurry for anyone to judge.B. Participants were paid to give wrong answers.C. They knew the answer was wrong but feared standing out.D. They could not hear the questions clearly.
3. What does the word "dissenting" most likely mean in the passage?A. Agreeing with everyone else.B. Holding a different opinion and breaking ranks.C. Sleeping during the test.D. Leading the whole group.
4. What is the author's main purpose in writing this passage?A. To show that groups usually give wrong answers.B. To encourage readers to stay away from other people.C. To describe how to run a psychology laboratory.D. To explain Asch's conformity findings and what they teach about group pressure.

逐题解析

Q5 答案：A

正确原因：细节题。第二段"based on 123 male undergraduates and reported between 1951 and 1956, about 37 percent of responses on the critical rounds copied the wrong majority"直接给出被试人数、年份与关键轮从众率，A 三项均吻合。

干扰项：B 反向——实验恰恰显示人们在群体压力下会否认自己的判断；C 歪曲——被试为 1950 年代男性本科生，非"1970 年代女性"；D 歪曲——从众率随群体增至约 3 人后"changed little（封顶）"，非"无限上升"。

Q6 答案：C　★踮脚

正确原因：推理判断题（推一步）。第三段"knew perfectly well the group was wrong; they simply did not want to seem difficult or stand out"与"normative influence——win acceptance or avoid rejection"须合并，推出：人们明知答案错，却因不想显得难搞/不合群而从众，原文须两步推导。

干扰项：A 反向——线条"crisp（清晰）"，对照组错误率 <1%，非"模糊"；B 无据——未提被试被收买；D 无据——任务为公开口头判断，非"听不清"。

Q7 答案：B

正确原因：词义猜测题。第四段"one dissenting ally who broke ranks and gave the right answer ... conformity collapsed to about 5 percent"中，dissenting 与"broke ranks（脱离一致）/ gave the right answer（持不同答案）"并列，目标词已加粗提示定位，义为"持异议的、脱离集体的"，B 最贴合。

干扰项：A 与"脱离一致、给出不同答案"相反；C/D 均与"打破群体错误、拉低从众率"的语境无关。

Q8 答案：D

正确原因：写作目的题。全文先介绍 Asch 实验与数据、再析"规范性/信息性"从众机制、末段给出"一名异议盟友"与跨文化验证的启示，目的在"解释从众发现并说明其之于群体压力的启示"。

干扰项：A 夸大——文中称约 25% 从未从众、2/3 判断独立，未主张"群体通常错"；B 曲解——仅说"抵抗只需一个敢说真话的同伴"，非劝人"远离他人"；C 偏题——提及实验设计为溯源，并非教人"如何开实验室"。

语篇分析

体裁：议论文／说明文（外刊社会心理通识改写，论证清晰、长难句密集）。
结构：提（Asch 1950s Swarthmore 线段实验：7–8 人组、1 真被试＋同谋、18 轮约 12 关键轮，答案一目了然）→ 证（核心研究 123 名男性本科生、1951–1956；关键轮约 37% 从众、约 75% 至少一次、约 25% 从不；对照组 <1%）→ 析（规范性 vs 信息性社会影响：Deutsch & Gerard 1955；清晰线条→规范性压力为主）→ 转（一名 dissenting 盟友使关键轮降至约 5%；群体效应约 3 人封顶）→ 用（Bond & Smith 1996 元分析 133 项 17 国；Tu & Fischbach 2015 中美韩 replication 无大差；核心启示：明显事实也会在压力下弯曲，抵抗只需一个敢说真话的同伴）。
难度提示：Q6 为★踮脚推理，须回到"normative influence（明知错却怕不合群）"机制；长句如"we assume the crowd sees a truth we missed"需拆主从句。

核心词汇（8–12 个，含派生词构词法）

词组 / 固定搭配

deny the evidence of one's eyes 否认自己眼睛看到的证据go along (with) 附和；顺从stand out 显得突出；不合群break ranks 脱离集体；打破一致up to a point 在某种程度上a quiet wish to belong 想融入群体的安静愿望stay true 依然成立；保持不变

阅读知识点

① 阅读——"实验类细节题"回原文比数字：Q5 考查 Asch 实验事实，须回第二段锁定"123 undergraduates / 1951–1956 / 约 37% 关键轮从众"，排除"信任自己眼睛 / 女性 1970 年代 / 随群体无限上升"等扭曲。
② 阅读——"机制解释推理（踮脚）"法：Q6 的正确项须把"normative influence：明知群体错却不想显得难搞/不合群"与"avoid rejection"合成，干扰项往往只截取"线条模糊 / 被收买 / 听不清"等单点曲解。

练习建议：心理类议论文先抓"概念—实验—机制—启示"四段式，推理题圈出每段核心概念，再判断选项是否"机制合成"而非"单点曲解"。

完形第一次跑完800米

体裁：记叙文（成长叙事·坚持与成长）　词数：约 269　难度：★★★☆（15 空，含近义辨析/固定搭配/语境推理）

原文（阅读下列短文，掌握大意后从每题所给 A、B、C、D 四个选项中选出最佳选项）

I still remember the first time I ____(1)____ a whole 800-meter race at the school sports meet. Before the starting gun sounded, my heart was ____(2)____ and my hands felt cold with nervous sweat. I had never run that far in a real competition before, and a small worried voice inside kept telling me to ____(3)____. The distance looked impossible to my frightened mind.

When the sharp whistle blew, I ____(4)____ forward with the others. The first lap felt easy and even fun, but by the second my legs began to ____(5)____ and my breath came in short, sharp gasps that burned. A familiar classmate on the sideline shouted ____(6)____ words, telling me not to stop. Her warm voice gave me a fresh reason to keep ____(7)____. Each step felt heavier, yet her words pulled me forward.

On the final straight, my tired body wanted to ____(8)____, yet I pictured my teacher's smile and pushed harder. The crowd's cheering grew louder and clearer, and somehow my tired feet found a ____(9)____ pace. With just ten meters left, I ____(10)____ past two runners who had led most of the way. My legs screamed, but my will refused to listen.

The moment I ____(11)____ the finish line, I nearly fell to the ground, exhausted but ____(12)____. Friends rushed over at once, and one ____(13)____ me on the back, saying I had surprised everyone. That quiet evening I ____(14)____ that finishing was not about being the fastest, but about refusing to give up. The medal mattered less than what I had learned.

It was a single 800-meter race, but it left a ____(15)____ mark on how I see effort and courage: real growth begins where comfort ends.

题目（Blank 1–15）

1. ____(1)____A. completedB. missedC. watchedD. canceled
2. ____(2)____A. calmB. fullC. racingD. asleep
3. ____(3)____A. laughB. quitC. singD. wait
4. ____(4)____A. lookedB. satC. fellD. dashed
5. ____(5)____A. smileB. acheC. shineD. rest
6. ____(6)____A. encouragingB. angryC. strangeD. silent
7. ____(7)____A. silentB. hiddenC. goingD. sleeping
8. ____(8)____A. singB. laughC. winD. slow
9. ____(9)____A. steadyB. lazyC. wrongD. broken
10. ____(10)____A. walkedB. sprintedC. crawledD. jumped
11. ____(11)____A. drewB. sawC. leftD. crossed
12. ____(12)____A. angryB. lostC. proudD. confused
13. ____(13)____A. pattedB. kickedC. pushedD. ignored
14. ____(14)____A. promisedB. realizedC. deniedD. forgot
15. ____(15)____A. smallB. sadC. falseD. lasting

逐题解析

空 (1) 答案：A

语境推理。全文回忆"第一次跑完 800 米"，completed（完成）与标题"跑完"及后文冲线呼应，是触发全文的成长事件。

干扰项：B missed（错过）／C watched（观看）／D canceled（取消）均不能承接"亲自参赛并跑完"的语境。

空 (2) 答案：C

语境逻辑。赛前紧张，"心跳racing（怦怦直跳）"与"手发冷"共同写出初次参赛的慌乱，与后文"从没跑过这么远"呼应。

干扰项：A calm（平静）／B full（满的）／D asleep（睡着的）均不能与"紧张、手冷"构成赛前状态。

空 (3) 答案：B

语义搭配。心里的小声音一直劝"我"quit（放弃），写出想退缩的本能，与后文"被同学鼓励、坚持"形成转折。

干扰项：A laugh（笑）／C sing（唱）／D wait（等）均不能表达"想打退堂鼓"。

空 (4) 答案：D

语境逻辑。哨响后"我"和别人一起向前dashed（冲/疾跑），与赛跑起跑情境自然契合。

干扰项：A looked（看）／B sat（坐）／C fell（摔倒）均不能描述"起跑冲出"。

空 (5) 答案：B

语义搭配。第二圈"腿开始ache（酸痛）"且"喘粗气"，写出体力消耗，引出想放弃。

干扰项：A smile（笑）／C shine（发亮）／D rest（休息）均不能与"leg + 喘粗气"构成疲劳画面。

空 (6) 答案：A

语境逻辑。场边同学喊encouraging（鼓励的）话、叫"别停"，与"给我理由继续"一致，是情感助推。

干扰项：B angry（生气的）／C strange（奇怪的）／D silent（沉默的）均与"加油鼓劲"基调相反。

空 (7) 答案：C

固定搭配。keep going（继续前进）与"别停"直接呼应，写出被激励后不放弃。

干扰项：A silent（沉默）／B hidden（躲藏）／D sleeping（睡觉）均不能接在 keep 后表达"坚持跑"。

空 (8) 答案：D

语义搭配。最后直道身体想slow（慢下来），但"我"想起老师微笑更用力冲，写出意志对抗疲劳。

干扰项：A sing（唱）／B laugh（笑）／C win（赢）代入"身体想___"均不自然（win 是结果非身体冲动）。

空 (9) 答案：A

语义搭配。疲惫的双脚找到steady（稳定的）节奏，与"观众更响、最后发力"形成稳定输出。

干扰项：B lazy（懒的）／C wrong（错的）／D broken（破碎的）均不能修饰"pace（节奏）"表良好状态。

空 (10) 答案：B

语境逻辑。最后十米"我"sprinted（冲刺）超过一路领先的两人，是小高潮，呼应"更用力推"。

干扰项：A walked（走）／C crawled（爬）／D jumped（跳）均不能表达"最后超越对手的冲刺"。

空 (11) 答案：D

固定搭配。crossed the finish line（冲过终点线）是赛事固定表达，收束比赛动作。

干扰项：A drew（拉/画）／B saw（看见）／C left（离开）均不能与"finish line"构成"冲线"。

空 (12) 答案：C

语境逻辑。冲线后"筋疲力尽却proud（自豪）"，与坚持到底的情感主线一致，点明成长收获。

干扰项：A angry（生气）／B lost（迷失的）／D confused（困惑的）均与"完成挑战的成就感"相反。

空 (13) 答案：A

语境逻辑。朋友冲过来拍patted "我"后背，说"惊艳了大家"，是善意与认可的温柔动作。

干扰项：B kicked（踢）／C pushed（推）／D ignored（无视）均为粗鲁或冷淡动作，破坏温情基调。

空 (14) 答案：B

语境逻辑。那晚"我"realized（意识到）完赛不在于最快，而在于不放弃，点明主旨领悟。

干扰项：A promised（承诺）／C denied（否认）／D forgot（忘记）代入"___ 完赛不在速度"均不如 realized 贴"领悟"。

空 (15) 答案：D

语境逻辑。这场比赛留下lasting（持久的）印记，与"成长始于舒适终止处"的升华一致，温柔收尾。

干扰项：A small（小的）／B sad（悲伤的）／C false（虚假的）均不能表达"坚持带来的深远正向影响"。

语篇分析

体裁：记叙文（个人成长叙事，第一人称）。
结构：起（第一次跑完 800 米、赛前心跳加速手冷、从没跑过这么远、心里想放弃）→ 承（哨响冲出、首圈轻松、次圈腿酸喘粗气、同学鼓励别停）→ 转（最后直道身体想慢、想起老师微笑更用力、找到稳定节奏、最后十米冲刺超两人）→ 合（冲线筋疲力尽却自豪、朋友拍背致意、当晚领悟完赛不在速度而在不放弃、留下持久印记）。
难度提示：15 空覆盖近义辨析（racing/calm、ache/smile、encouraging/angry、proud/lost、lasting/small）、固定搭配（keep going、cross the finish line、patted on the back）、语境推理（completed、quit、dashed、slow、steady、sprinted、realized）；无"见搭配即选"的送分题，须回语境与全文"紧张—起步—想退—被激励—坚持—冲线—自豪—领悟"主线判断。

核心词汇（8–12 个，含派生词构词法）

词组 / 固定搭配

the starting gun 发令枪keep going 坚持下去on the final straight 在最后直道push harder 更加努力find a steady pace 找到稳定节奏cross the finish line 冲过终点线where comfort ends 在舒适终止处

阅读知识点

① 完形填空——"全文主线复现"法：答案须与"紧张—起步—想退—被激励—坚持—冲线—自豪—领悟"主线一致，而非孤立通顺即选；如空 (2) racing 呼应赛前心跳加速，空 (12) proud 呼应坚持后的自豪，空 (15) lasting 呼应"成长印记"的升华。
② 完形填空——"近义辨析+语境色彩"双锁：空 (5)（ache vs smile）须看"腿累＋喘粗气"的疲劳画面；空 (10)（sprinted vs walked/crawled）须看"最后十米超过两人"的冲刺语境；空 (15)（lasting vs small/sad）须看"持久正向影响"的收尾基调。

练习建议：完形先通读抓"起承转合"四步脉络与情感主线，再逐空判断"搭配对不对、语境顺不顺、全文复现不"，三关全过才选。