真题实讲 · 英语高考阅读理解题型专练(2025年全国一卷C篇)

本期，我们就踏踏实实攻克一类题型——我会带着大家用「四步狙击法」，把2025年全国一卷C篇这道细节理解题层层拆解。最后，我还额外准备了一道巩固小练、一句值得品的长难句，再帮你划出核心词汇。用不了多久，这些方法就能长在你手上，变成想忘都忘不掉的肌肉记忆。跟着节奏走、慢慢磨，加油，你一定行！

part 1· 阅读原文

While safety improvements might have been made to our streets in recent years, transport studies also show declines in pedestrian(行人) mobility, especially among young children. Many parents say there's too much traffic on the roads for their children to walk safely to school, so they pack them into the car instead.

Dutch authors Thalia Verkade and Marco te Brömmelstroet are bothered by facts like these. In their new book Movement: How to Take Back Our Streets and Transform Our Lives, they call for a rethink of our streets and the role they play in our lives.

Life on city streets started to change decades ago. Whole neighbourhoods were destroyed to make way for new road networks and kids had to play elsewhere. Some communities fought back. Most famously, a Canadian journalist who had moved her family to Manhattan in the early 1950s led a campaign to stop the destruction of her local park. Describing her alarm at its proposed replacement with an expressway, Jane Jacobs called on her mayor(市长) to champion "New York as a decent place to live, and not just rush through." Similar campaigns occurred in Australia in the late 1960s and 1970s as well.

Although these campaigns were widespread, the reality is that the majority of the western cities were completely redesigned around the needs of the motor car. The number of cars on roads has been increasing rapidly. In Australia we now have over twenty million cars for just over twenty-six million people, among the highest rate of car ownership in the world.

We invest a lot in roads that help us rush through, but we fail to account for the true costs. Do we really recognise what it costs us as a society when children can't move safely around our communities? The authors of Movement have it right: it's time to think differently about that street outside your front door.

part 2· 真题演练（四步狙击法 + 补丁）

👀别急着蒙答案！跟着「四步狙击法 + 细节题补丁」走一遍，正确答案会自己浮出来。咱们稳扎稳打，把这一分拿稳 💪

Q：What phenomenon does the author point out in paragraph 1?

第一步 ·截获靶心

圈出关键词 phenomenon、paragraph 1、point out，明确问的是「第一段所指出的现象」，锁定回第一段找事实。

第二步 ·追踪弹道

锁定第一段两句关键句："transport studies also show declines in pedestrian mobility, especially among young children" 与 "so they pack them into the car instead"。

第三步 ·  筛除迷雾

A「车常堵路」、B「事故频发」、D「行人违规」原文均未提及，属无中生有。→ 答案选 C。

part 3· 同题型巩固练习

👊 光看不过瘾，动手才长记性！来一道同款题，练练你的"狙击手感"：

According to paragraph 3, what did Jane Jacobs urge her mayor to do?

【答案】

B。定位第三段 "Jane Jacobs called on her mayor to champion 'New York as a decent place to live, and not just rush through.'"，urge ≈ call on，同义转述一致；A 与文意相反（她反对修高速），C、D 未提及。

part 4· 长难句剖析

📖 别浪费每一篇原文——来看看里面藏着哪些精华长难句，拆开它，就是白送的分数。

原句（第4段首句）：Although these campaigns were widespread, the reality is that the majority of the western cities were completely redesigned around the needs of the motor car.

① "Although these campaigns were widespread" 为让步状语从句（这些运动虽广泛开展）；

② 主句主干 "the reality is that…"，"that" 引导表语从句；

③ 表语从句："the majority of the western cities were completely redesigned around the needs of the motor car"（西方多数城市被完全围绕汽车的需求重新设计）。

提分点：Although 引出"理想（有运动）"，主句用 the reality is that… 转折出"现实（城市仍为车而建）"，形成"理想 vs 现实"对比，是高考高频句式。

part 5· 词汇与句型积累

📚 好文章，一定要"榨干"它的价值：下面这几个词和句型，背下来就是你的提分弹药库。

经典句型打卡：

① "While / Although 引导让步状语从句"：While safety improvements…, studies also show declines…（表"尽管……但……"对比）

② "call on sb. to do sth."　号召 / 呼吁某人做某事（原文：called on her mayor to champion…）

··· ◇ ···

下期预告：推理判断题专练 ｜关注本号，每期吃透一个阅读考点。

备课不易，觉得有用的话，转发给同样在刷题的同学，一起少走弯路哦~

#高考英语#阅读理解#细节理解题#四关突破法#英语做题技巧