夜雨聆风核心原则：真诚是基础，解决问题是关键
所有回复需满足：✅ 不辩解 ✅ 不敷衍 ✅ 有行动 ✅ 可追溯（标注修改位置）
一、无法补充审稿人建议的实验 / 数据
回复公式：认同价值 + 客观说明限制 + 现有数据支撑 + 未来规划
完整模板：
“The authors highly appreciate the reviewer’s valuable suggestion, which is crucial for further improving the depth of this study. We fully agree that additional experiments on [具体实验内容，如 “sample stability under extreme conditions”] would help strengthen the reliability of the conclusions. However, due to practical limitations (可多选或补充具体原因：① the specialized equipment required is not currently available in our laboratory; ② the revision deadline is too tight to complete the time-consuming experiments; ③ the acquisition of specific samples requires long-term cooperation with industrial partners), it is impractical to conduct the proposed experiments within the current revision period.
Nevertheless, the existing data in Section X (Page X, Line X) have provided sufficient evidence to support the core conclusion: [简要复述现有数据的逻辑链，如 “the repeated tests under three typical conditions consistently verify the effectiveness of the proposed method”]. To address this concern as much as possible, we have supplemented [替代方案，如 “additional statistical analysis of existing data”/“a detailed discussion on the limitations of the current experimental design”] in the revised manuscript (Page X, Line X).
Looking forward, we plan to carry out the suggested experiments as part of our follow-up research and will consider submitting the extended results to this journal in the future.”
二、审稿人因误解产生的评论
回复公式：致歉 + 澄清原意 + 具体修改 + 指引位置
完整模板：
“We sincerely apologize for the confusion caused to the reviewer regarding [具体误解的内容，如 “the definition of the proposed index”]. In the original manuscript, our intended meaning was: [清晰阐述原意，如 “this index reflects the relative change rather than the absolute value of the parameter”].
To eliminate ambiguity, we have revised the corresponding part in Section X (Page X, Line X) as follows: [直接粘贴修改后的原文，如 “‘The proposed Index A is defined as the ratio of the target value to the reference value, which quantifies the relative variation of the system performance.’”]. Additionally, we have added a supplementary explanation in the footnote (Page X) to further clarify the concept. We believe the revised expression can accurately convey our original intention.”
三、审稿人指出的明显错误（语法 / 格式 / 数据错误等）
回复公式：诚恳致歉 + 说明修改 + 追溯位置 + 避免承诺
完整模板：
“We apologize sincerely for the careless mistake pointed out by the reviewer. This error was caused by [简要说明原因，如 “oversight during the final proofreading”/“a miscalculation in data collation”], which does not affect the core conclusions of the study.
As suggested, we have corrected the error in the revised manuscript: ① For the grammatical error in Section X (Page X, Line X), we have rephrased the sentence as [修改后内容]; ② For the incorrect data in Table X (Page X), we have verified it with the original experimental records and updated the value to [正确数据].
We have carefully checked the entire manuscript to avoid similar errors, and we appreciate the reviewer’s meticulousness for helping us improve the quality of the paper.”
四、审稿人要求增加相关文献
回复公式：认同建议 + 文献价值 + 已引用 + 补充延伸
完整模板：
“We fully agree with the reviewer’s suggestion that the literature related to [文献主题，如 “machine learning-based fault diagnosis”] is essential to contextualize our study. The referenced works by [作者，如 “Zhang et al. (2023)”] and [作者，如 “Li et al. (2022)”] have made important contributions to this field, especially in [文献核心观点，如 “the establishment of the baseline model”], which strongly supports our research background.
In the revised manuscript, we have added these references: ① [文献 1，格式按期刊要求，如 “Zhang, S., et al. (2023). Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on CNN. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 70 (5), 4890-4899.”] (cited in Section X, Page X, Line X); ② [文献 2] (cited in Section X, Page X, Line X). Additionally, we have supplemented 2 more recent studies [文献 3/4] to further enrich the literature review and highlight the incremental contribution of our work. All new references are listed in the reference section (No. X-X) and cited at the appropriate positions.”
五、审稿人要求补充说明，但原文已有相关内容
回复公式：感谢关注 + 指引原文位置 + 补充强化 + 便于查阅
完整模板：
“Thank you for the reviewer’s attention to [具体内容，如 “the validation process of the model”]. In fact, the relevant explanation has been included in the original manuscript (Section X, Page X, Line X), which states: [直接引用原文关键句，如 “‘The model was validated using 5-fold cross-validation, with the training set accounting for 80% of the total data and the test set 20%. The average accuracy of 5 independent runs was used as the final evaluation index.’”].
To make it more prominent and easy to find, we have: ① Highlighted the corresponding paragraph in the revised manuscript (Page X); ② Added a brief summary in the discussion section (Page X, Line X) to connect this validation process with the core conclusions; ③ Supplemented a flow chart (Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials) to visually illustrate the validation steps. We hope these revisions can help the reviewer quickly grasp the relevant information.”
六、额外补充：面对 “过度要求” 或 “不合理意见”
回复公式：尊重立场 + 理性解释 + 提供替代方案 + 保持沟通
完整模板：
“We respect the reviewer’s perspective on [具体意见内容，如 “the need for more case studies”]. We acknowledge that additional case studies could expand the application scope of the research, but considering the core focus of this paper is [论文核心主题，如 “the proposed method’s theoretical framework and fundamental effectiveness”], excessive case studies may lead to redundant content and weaken the focus on the key innovations.
To balance the reviewer’s suggestion and the paper’s focus, we have supplemented [替代方案，如 “a detailed discussion on the applicability of the method to different scenarios”/“a table summarizing the potential application cases and their key parameters”] in Section X (Page X). This revision not only responds to the concern about application validation but also maintains the conciseness of the paper.
If the reviewer insists on additional case studies, we are willing to further supplement them in the next revision or provide relevant data as supplementary materials. We appreciate the reviewer’s guidance and look forward to your further comments.”
实用小贴士：
所有回复需逐条对应审稿人意见，标注 “Response to Reviewer 1, Comment 1” 等，便于编辑和审稿人查阅； 修改位置务必精准（Page X, Line X），正文修改部分可标黄或用修订模式，降低审稿人核对成本； 语气始终保持 “尊重 + 谦逊”，避免使用 “we think”“it is unnecessary” 等强硬表述； 若有多个审稿人，相同问题可统一回复，但需针对性调整表述（如 “Reviewer 1 and 3 both mentioned…”）。
如果需要针对具体审稿意见（如方法学质疑、结论争议等）定制回复，后台 1～
Word版领取，后台 1~
