ARTICLE · 1226619
2017 年英语二· Text 2 真题精讲
发布时间：2026-10-22 08:11:27 最近访问：2026-10-22 08:11:13
2017 年英语二· Text 2 真题精讲
2017 年英语二 · Text 2 ｜ 父母刷手机，孩子的脸会"垮下来" 前 3 段由 Radesky 一派立论——父母自己刷手机，会大幅挤占亲子互动；婴儿天生盯着父母的脸来读世界，一张"面无表情"的脸足以让孩子越来越惊恐，所以父母应当回应孩子的情感需求。 第 4 段笔锋一转，Tronick 反过来质疑"父母必须时时陪伴"这套说法本身就是一种压迫性理念：孩子从屏幕里学不到东西，不等于它没有价值，只要能给父母腾出喘口气的时间，反而能让他们更好地陪伴孩子。 前 3 题考细节定位，后 2 题考"谁说了什么"的辨析——千万别把两位学者的立场混在一起。先翻译吃透，再按 STEP 四步法逐题击破。PART 1 · 全文翻译 + 长难句标注 + 生词短语标注说明：红色加粗 = 谓语动词 蓝色加粗 = 连词 黄色荧光 = 从句①With so much focus on children's use of screens, it is easy for parents to forget about their own screen use. ②"Tech is designed to really suck you in," says Jenny Radesky in her study of digital play, and digital products are there to promote maximal engagement. ③It makes it hard to disengage, and leads to a lot of bleed-over into the family routine.①父母把注意力太多地放在孩子的屏幕使用上，反而容易忘记自己的屏幕使用。②"技术就是被设计来把你吸进去的，"詹妮·拉德斯基在她关于数字娱乐的研究中说，"数字产品存在的目的就是促成最大程度的投入。③它让人难以抽身，并大量侵占到家庭日常安排里。| 词汇 / 短语 | 释义 |
| focus on | |
| be designed to do | |
| suck sb. in | |
| digital play | |
| maximal adj. | |
| engagement n. | |
| disengage v. | |
| bleed-over n. | |
| routine n. | |
①Radesky has studied the use of mobile phones and tablets at mealtimes by giving mother–child pairs a food-testing exercise. ②She found that mothers who used devices during the exercise started 20 percent fewer verbal and 39 percent fewer nonverbal interactions with their children. ③During a separate observation, she saw that phones became a source of tension in the family. ④Parents would be looking at their emails while the children would be making excited bids for their attention.①拉德斯基研究过用餐时间手机和平板的使用情况，方法是让一对对母子参加一次"食物品尝"实验。②她发现，实验中使用了设备的母亲，与孩子的语言互动减少了 20%，非语言互动减少了 39%。③在另一次独立观察中，她看到手机成了家庭里紧张关系的来源。④父母在查看邮件，而孩子们则在急切地想要引起他们的注意。| 词汇 / 短语 | 释义 |
| mealtime n. | |
| mother–child pair | |
| food-testing exercise | |
| device n. | |
| verbal adj. | 语言的；口头的（反义 nonverbal 非语言的） |
| interaction n. | |
| observation n. | |
| a source of tension | |
| bid n. | 努力争取（make a bid for 争取；文中指急切地想引起注意） |
①Infants are wired to look at parents' faces to try to understand their world, and if those faces are blank and unresponsive—as they often are when absorbed in a device—it can be extremely disconcerting for the children. ②Radesky cites the "still face experiment" devised by developmental psychologist Ed Tronick in the 1970s. ③In it, a mother is asked to interact with her child in a normal way before putting on a blank expression and not giving them any visual social feedback: The child becomes increasingly distressed as she tries to capture her mother's attention. ④"Parents don't have to be exquisitely present at all times, but there needs to be a balance and parents need to be responsive and sensitive to a child's verbal or nonverbal expressions of an emotional need," says Radesky.①婴儿天生就会看着父母的脸去理解这个世界，而那些脸如果毫无表情、毫无回应——当大人沉浸在设备里时往往就是如此——会让孩子极度不安。②拉德斯基引用了发展心理学家埃德·特罗尼克在 20 世纪 70 年代设计的"静止脸实验"。③实验中，一位母亲被要求先以正常方式与孩子互动，然后摆出毫无表情的样子、不给孩子任何视觉上的社交反馈：孩子越是努力想赢得母亲的注意，就越是痛苦。④"父母不必时刻都做到完美地'在场'，但需要有一种平衡，而且父母需要对孩子的语言或非语言的情感需求表达做出回应、保持敏感，"拉德斯基说。| 词汇 / 短语 | 释义 |
| infant n. | |
| be wired to do | |
| blank adj. | |
| unresponsive adj. | |
| be absorbed in | |
| disconcerting adj. | |
| cite v. | |
| devise v. | |
| put on a blank expression | |
| distressed adj. | |
| exquisitely adv. | |
| be responsive to | |
| be sensitive to | |
①On the other hand, Tronick himself is concerned that the worries about kids' use of screens are born out of an "oppressive ideology that demands that parents should always be interacting" with their children: "It is based on a somewhat fantasized, very white, very upper-middle-class ideology that says if you are failing to expose your child to 30,000 words you are neglecting them." ②Tronick believes that just because a child isn't learning from the screendoesn't meanthere is no value to it—particularly if it gives parents time to have a shower, do housework or simply have a break from their child. ③Parents, he says, can get a lot out of using their devices to speak to a friend or get some work out of the way. ④This can make them feel happier, which lets them be more available to their child the rest of the time.①另一方面，特罗尼克本人则担心，对孩子们使用屏幕的种种忧虑，源自一种"要求父母应当始终与孩子互动"的压迫性观念："它建立在某种虚构的、非常白人、非常中上阶层的观念之上——这种观念认为，如果你没能让孩子接触到三万个词汇，你就是在忽视他。"②特罗尼克认为，仅仅因为孩子没从屏幕上学到东西，并不意味着它没有价值——尤其是当它能让父母有时间洗个澡、做点家务，或者干脆从孩子身边喘口气时。③他说，父母可以通过设备跟朋友聊聊天、或者把手头的一些工作处理掉，从中获益不少。④这能让他们心情更好，从而在剩下的时间里更有精力陪伴孩子。| 词汇 / 短语 | 释义 |
| on the other hand | |
| be concerned that | |
| be born out of | |
| oppressive adj. | |
| ideology n. | |
| demand v. | |
| fantasized adj. | |
| upper-middle-class adj. | |
| expose sb. to sth. | |
| neglect v. | |
| have a break from | |
| get sth. out of the way | |
| be available to sb. | |
STEP 1 找定位词 → STEP 2 找定位句 → STEP 3 精读定位句 → STEP 4 匹配选项一句话抓主旨：Radesky 一派用实验证明"父母刷手机会挤掉亲子互动、孩子对'面无表情'极其敏感"，主张父母要回应孩子的情感需求；第 4 段 Tronick 反戈一击——"父母必须时时互动"本身是压迫性理念，屏幕能给父母换来喘息时间，反而让他们能更好地陪伴孩子。全文是"正方立论 + 反方质疑"的双观点结构。According to Jenny Radesky, digital products are designed to ______.[A] simplify routine matters.[B] absorb user attention. ✓[C] better interpersonal relations.[D] increase work efficiency.Jenny Radesky + digital products + are designed to（题干原词几乎全在第一段）。"Tech is designed to really suck you in," says Jenny Radesky... "and digital products are there to promote maximal engagement. It makes it hard to disengage..."两句在说同一件事：被设计来 suck you in（把你吸进去），目的就是 promote maximal engagement（促成最大程度的投入）——合起来就是"牢牢吸住使用者的注意力"。后一句 It makes it hard to disengage（让人难以抽身）进一步加固这个方向。[A] 简化日常事务（simplify routine matters）——原文确实出现 routine，但说的是屏幕"侵占"家庭日常（bleed-over into the family routine），是负面后果，不是产品设计目的，属偷换概念；[B] 吸引用户注意力（absorb user attention）——suck you in / maximal engagement 的同义改写，当选 B；[C] 改善人际关系——原文说互动减少，方向相反；[D] 提高工作效率——无中生有（work efficiency 全文未提，第 4 段说的是父母"把工作处理掉"以便陪孩子，与"产品提高效率"无关）。Radesky's food-testing exercise shows that mothers' use of devices ______.[A] takes away babies' appetite.[B] distracts children's attention.[C] slows down babies' verbal development.[D] reduces mother-child communication. ✓food-testing exercise + mothers' use of devices，两词同在第二段首句。"She found that mothers who used devices during the exercise started 20 percent fewer verbal and 39 percent fewer nonverbal interactions with their children."实验结论只有一个数据：用设备的母亲，与孩子的 语言互动减少 20%、非语言互动减少 39%。两个百分比指向同一点——母子交流（interactions）整体变少。注意 interactions 是这句话的核心名词，也是选项的同义替换靶心。[A] 夺走婴儿的食欲（appetite）——food-testing 是"实验的名称"，不是"孩子在吃饭"，用 food 诱出 appetite 属望文生义；[B] 分散孩子的注意力——原文主语是母亲被设备占用，不是孩子被分散，主宾错位；[C] 拖慢婴儿的语言发育（verbal development）——原文是"当下言语互动数量减少"，不等于"语言能力发育迟缓"，且只取 verbal 丢了 nonverbal，以偏概全 + 拔高结论；[D] 减少母子交流（reduces mother-child communication）——"fewer verbal and nonverbal interactions"的准确概括，当选 D。Radesky cites the "still face experiment" to show that _______.[A] it is easy for children to get used to blank expressions.[B] verbal expressions are unnecessary for emotional exchange.[C] children are insensitive to changes in their parents' mood.[D] parents need to respond to children's emotional needs. ✓still face experiment + cites... to show（举例是为了证明观点 → 答案多在例子前后的观点句）。例中："The child becomes increasingly distressed as she tries to capture her mother's attention."（③）例后观点句（④）："Parents don't have to be exquisitely present at all times, but there needs to be a balance and parents need to be responsive and sensitive to a child's verbal or nonverbal expressions of an emotional need."例证题的解法是往例子外面找观点：静止脸实验里，孩子拼命想赢回母亲的注意、越来越痛苦，说明一张无回应的脸对婴儿杀伤力极大；紧接着 Radesky 给出结论——父母的核心任务是 responsive（做出回应）+ sensitive（保持敏感）。别停在例子本身。[A] 孩子容易习惯面无表情——原文是 increasingly distressed（越来越痛苦），正话反说；[B] 情感交流不需要言语表达——原文说 verbal or nonverbal 都算情感表达，都要回应，偷换；[C] 孩子对父母情绪变化不敏感——恰恰相反，孩子对面无表情极度敏感，反向干扰；[D] 父母需要回应孩子的情感需求——responsive / sensitive to emotional need 的直译，当选 D。The oppressive ideology mentioned by Tronick requires parents to _______.[A] protect kids from exposure to wild fantasies.[B] teach their kids at least 30,000 words a year.[C] ensure constant interaction with their children. ✓[D] remain concerned about kid's use of screens.oppressive ideology + requires parents to，锁定第四段第 ① 句（首次也是唯一一次出现该词）。"...the worries about kids' use of screens are born out of an 'oppressive ideology that demands that parents should always be interacting' with their children..."题干的两处同义替换就是答案通道：requires = demands（要求）；the oppressive ideology "要求父母"的内容 = should always be interacting with their children，即"始终与孩子互动"。always = constant。[A] 保护孩子不接触荒诞幻想（wild fantasies）——把原文形容这套观念本身的 fantasized（虚构的）误读成"要让孩子远离幻想"，偷换主语；[B] 每年至少教孩子三万个词——原文是 expose your child to 30,000 words（接触到三万个词），不是"每年教三万个"，且这只是该理念顺手举的一个例子，不是 requires 的内容，双错；[C] 确保与孩子持续互动（ensure constant interaction）——demand... should always be interacting 的同义改写，当选 C；[D] 继续担心孩子使用屏幕——"担心屏幕"是 Radesky 一派的立场，Tronick 正是质疑这种担心，张冠李戴。According to Tronick, kid's use of screens may _______.[A] give their parents some free time. ✓[B] make their parents more creative.[C] help them with their homework.[D] help them become more attentive.Tronick + kid's use of screens + may（问 Tronick 认为屏幕使用的潜在好处），锁定第四段第 ②③④ 句。"...particularly if it gives parents time to have a shower, do housework or simply have a break from their child."（②）"Parents, he says, can get a lot out of using their devices to speak to a friend or get some work out of the way. This can make them feel happier, which lets them be more available to their child the rest of the time."（③④）Tronick 的立场是"屏幕≠无价值"：它的价值在于替父母腾出时间——洗澡、做家务、跟朋友聊天、处理工作、从孩子身边喘口气；父母因此心情更好，反而更有精力陪孩子。三句话的落点都是"给父母减负 / 放假"。[A] 给父母一些自由时间（some free time）——have a break from their child / have time to have a shower 的同义概括，当选 A；[B] 让父母更有创造力——creative 全文未提，无中生有；[C] 帮孩子做作业——原文是父母用设备 get some work out of the way（处理掉父母自己的工作），主语和内容都被换掉，张冠李戴；[D] 帮他们变得更专注——原文说的是父母之后 more available（更有精力陪伴），且主体是父母不是孩子，主体错位 + 偷换。① 双观点文章先划界：On the other hand 一出现，前后就是两派。26-28 题只问 Radesky 一派，29-30 题只问 Tronick，跨界选就是张冠李戴（29 题 D 项即典型）；② 例证题往例子外找观点：28 题问 cites... to show，答案不在实验细节里，而在紧随其后的那句结论（responsive / sensitive）；③ 警惕"原文词汇诱饵"：26 题的 routine、27 题的 food、29 题的 30,000 words、30 题的 work 都直接来自原文，但都被改了主语、范围或性质——英二细节题的干扰项最爱用"原文原词 + 错误逻辑"；④ 正确答案几乎都是同义改写：suck you in = absorb attention，fewer interactions = reduce communication，demands = require，have a break = free time。 
