雅思写作真题|A2O LITE 13岁中国成员欠薪345万,我却想夸她跳舞哈喽刷题搭子们

同一天，她母亲名下公司被曝拖欠员工薪资、被强制执行约345万元，母亲本人被限高。道歉声明发了，几千字，没写还款日期。

评论区已经给她判完了：有钱培养出道，无钱偿还债务。

说到这儿我得先亮个私心。

我其实挺喜欢这个小姑娘的。

因为我看她舞台的第一眼，看的不是她的家境，是她的动作——卡点干净、力度干脆，那种东西装不出来。她的履历也硬：2013年4月生，北京人，Hiphop出身，2024年 WOD 世界舞蹈大赛中国区总决赛青少年组冠军，2025年赴美打全球总决赛拿了青少年组第三。

我这人有个毛病，跳得好的人我一律喜欢。这也是为什么我特别喜欢王一博——街舞这件事，骗不了人。 你把镜头、灯光、包装全给他，动作松一寸还是松一寸。

所以今天这篇，我想把两件事分开讲：跳得好是她的，欠薪是大人的。

这个分开，恰好就是雅思那道名人题最容易写坏的地方。

真题在这

2020年12月12日 大陆纸笔 A 类

Many celebrities are famous for their glamour and wealth rather than their contributions. This is a bad example to young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

同题变体 2023年5月13日

Nowadays, there are many celebrities who are famous for their glamour and wealth rather than achievements and this sets a bad example for young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

同一道题，隔两年半又考了一次。

先老实说一句：这条热搜和这道题，对得并不严丝合缝。争议的核心是"铺路的钱从哪来"，题目问的是"名人靠什么出名"。硬拗会跑题。

但它们撞在同一个论证单元上——我们到底分不分得清"被包装出来的"和"自己挣来的"。

三个审题坑，先排掉

坑一：glamour and wealth vs contributions

对比的是"出名的方式"，不是"名人该不该存在"。你要论证的是靠什么出名，不是名人好不好。

坑二：bad example to young people

落点必须在年轻人这一端——他们学到什么、被怎么影响。一上来就骂名人，写到第三句就偏了。

坑三：To extent / to what extent

允许带前提。全盘同意反而没层次；全盘否认，等于说"被看见"本身就是错，也站不住。

我的立场：大部分同意，但要先把"包装"和"真本事"切开。

范文（约 370 词）

Debates about celebrity culture often collapse two different questions into one: how somebody became visible, and whether that visibility was earned. The statement claims that fame resting on glamour and wealth rather than contribution sets a poor example for the young. Personally, I largely agree with the principle, although the line between packaging and genuine craft deserves a place in the argument.

One compelling argument is that glamour, once detached from contribution, teaches young audiences a distorted definition of success. This is because visibility is easily mistaken for worth: a performer who is filmed, styled and promoted receives the same applause as a scientist who spends a decade developing a vaccine. As a result, teenagers come to measure achievement by attention rather than effort, and the implied message is that being seen matters more than being useful.

Apart from distorting values, wealth-funded fame also conceals the machinery behind it. In other words, audiences see a polished stage but not the funding, the connections or the labour beneath it, so success appears effortless and therefore a matter of luck. Otherwise, if this illusion went unchallenged, young people without such backing would conclude that their own effort is irrelevant, and aspiration would quietly curdle into resignation. A recent example is telling: a teenage idol's debut topped streaming charts within days while her family's reported wage arrears of 3.45 million yuan remained unpaid.

Nevertheless, the criticism is not absolute, and this is where precision matters. Some young performers arrive with credentials that no amount of money can manufacture — a world dance championship, for instance, is won on stage rather than bought. Such talent deserves recognition, and holding a child responsible for an adult's financial conduct would be plainly unfair. However, cases of this kind are less likely to represent the majority, since algorithms reward spectacle far more reliably than they reward craft, and it is exactly this confusion that the statement is right to warn against.

In conclusion, fame built on glamour and wealth is a poor model for the young, mainly because it confuses visibility with value, as well as because it hides the advantages behind the shine. What young audiences need is not fewer stars, but a clearer line between the two.

🕊 白鸟老师小课堂

今天三个词，串一条链：真本事 → 包装出来的光 → 该追问谁。

① craft

技艺、真功夫 —— 练出来的，别人给不了。

大白话：给不了你的那部分，才叫 craft。

② glamour

光鲜、魅力 —— 镜头照得到的那层好看。

大白话：打光、造型、通稿，全算在 glamour 里。

③ accountability

担责、问责 —— 出了事，谁站出来认。

大白话：该被追问的人，往往是最不出镜的那个。

✍️大作文造例

==Craft== is what survives the camera being turned off; ==glamour== is what requires it to be switched on. Confusing the two is how a thirteen-year-old's championship and her family's unpaid wages end up in the same headline — and ==accountability==, the one word that belongs to the adults in that sentence, goes missing.

中文翻译：技艺是关掉镜头后仍然成立的东西，光鲜是必须有镜头才成立的东西。把这两者混为一谈，才会让一个13岁的冠军和她家里那笔没还的工资出现在同一个标题里——而担责，这个句子里唯一属于大人的词，反倒不见了。

高分搭配：survive the camera being turned off（镜头关掉后依然成立）／confuse A with B（把A与B混为一谈）／go missing（消失不见）

🔗 综合运用

这道题最高分的写法，不是一味骂名人，而是先切一刀再下判断：

craft（自己挣的）｜glamour（别人给的）｜accountability（谁该认）

三刀切完，body 段就不会再原地打转了。

三问，你挑一个回我

1. 你看一个明星，先看作品还是先看八卦？

2. 一个人跳得好、家里欠着钱，这两件事该不该放在同一个标题里？

3. 名人题考的到底是"名人"，还是"看名人的人"？

回在评论区，我挑几个明天拆。

雅思写作范文系列已经更了很久了，全是机考和纸笔的实考真题，一道没编。关键词"范文"，合集直接发你。

关注不迷路。 你的搭子下次还在。

—— 下期预告：今天还挂着一条"熬夜对大脑的损害不可逆"。考雅思的人，这是刚需。下一篇就写这个，还是真题。

Grace 在努力 ♡