夜雨聆风
熬过了外审，打开邮件看到一长串审稿意见，是不是瞬间头皮发麻？
别怕！审稿人愿意给你提意见，说明你的文章有戏。真正让人“翻车”的，往往不是意见有多难改，而是回复信写得不专业——语气不对、遗漏问题、语言表达拉胯……这些低级错误反而会让审稿人失去耐心。
今天结合实战模板，帮你理清 Response 的正确写法。
先礼貌感谢，再亮出态度
无论审稿人提了多少条意见，开篇一定要表达感谢。这不只是客套，而是表明你认真对待了他们的时间与专业建议。
通用开篇模板：
“Thank you very much for your comments and professional advice. These opinions help to improve the academic rigor of our article. Based on your suggestion and request, we have made corrected modifications on the revised manuscript.”
如果期刊对语言有要求，最好主动提一句你已经找了专业润色服务，比如：
“Meanwhile, the manuscript has been reviewed and edited by language services of ELSEVIER.”
“We feel sorry for our poor writings, however, we have invited a native English speaker to help polish our article.”
这一句话，能给审稿人留下“作者很专业、很认真”的第一印象。
逐条回答，不遗漏任何一条意见
这是回复信的核心。基本原则只有两条：
逐条列出来（Reviewer 1# → 问题1 → 回答1）
每条都要回应，哪怕是“已修改”或“已在文中标注”
常见问题类型及回复套路
类型1：质疑某个技术细节（比如pH值、浓度等）
审稿人：“Finally, the dialysis bag was suspended in PBS……What pH of PBS?”
作者回答：“The dialysis bag was suspended in PBS (pH 7.4).”
✅ 要点：直接补充数据，简洁清晰，别绕弯子。
类型2：要求补充文献或数据来源
审稿人：“How much BA is reported?”
作者回答：引用数据库或文献，给出具体数值及出处。
“Based on the search results of TCMSP, the oral bioavailability of icariin is 41.58%. Please see the reference: …”
✅ 要点：有理有据，附上链接或文献信息。
类型3：指出语言或拼写错误
“We were really sorry for our careless mistakes. Thank you for your reminder.”
“Thanks for your careful checks. Based on your comments, we have made the corrections to harmonize the unit within the whole manuscript.”
✅ 要点：诚恳认错，说明已修正，不必过度解释。
类型4：要求补实验（最让人头疼）
如果能补：如实说明补充了哪些数据，修改了哪一部分。
如果补不出来：找文献支撑，说明该实验本身难度或已有共识。
“As suggested, we have tried our best to verify by XXX. However, no signal has been detected. Other researchers also found that it is very difficult to obtain a well-resolved structure in this system.”
写在最后
很多问题改好了，但回复信本身语法错误连篇、中式表达严重。审稿人看到这种回复，第一反应就是：“作者连信都写不顺，文章能好到哪去？”
更致命的是，有些期刊明确要求投稿或返修时需提供语言润色证明。如果你忽略了这一步，可能直接被退回。
如果你的内容不过关译墨可以为你提供语言润色、学术翻译、格式排版、返修指导、审稿评估等方面获得专业支持，译墨将为您提供全套服务，助力您的科研成果高效发表、顺利见刊。
找译墨不emo
助力中国科研走向世界
被审稿人问到命脉了怎么办↓↓
