2026年10月10日雅思写作真题解析

第一道

Some people think that extreme sports that are dangerous, such as skydiving and rock-climbing, should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

真题解析

本题属于社会政策类与个人自由类话题，核心在于平衡个人选择权与公共安全。支持禁令的一方可以从严重伤亡风险、医疗资源负担及救援人员安全等角度展开论证；反对全面禁止的一方则可以强调个人自主权、极限运动的身心价值以及风险管理措施的有效性。建议采取部分同意的立场：不赞成一刀切地禁止所有极限运动，但支持政府通过专业资质认证、安全标准、风险告知和场地监管等措施限制不负责任的行为。这样既能体现批判性思维，也能充分回应题目中的should be banned。

关键词解析

extreme sports【极限运动】

指具有较高身体风险、对技术和心理素质要求较高的运动，例如跳伞、攀岩、蹦极和极限滑雪。

dangerous=hazardous【危险的】

highly risky=fraught with danger【充满危险的】

the possibility of injury=the risk of physical harm【身体受到伤害的风险】

serious accidents=potentially life-threatening incidents【可能危及生命的事故】

cause injuries=inflict serious physical harm【造成严重身体伤害】

should be banned【应该被禁止】

题目考查的是全面禁止是否合理，而不是危险运动是否存在风险。

outright prohibition【全面禁止】

strict regulation【严格监管】。

ban something completely=impose an outright ban on something【对某事实施全面禁令】

control an activity=regulate an activity【对某项活动进行监管】

strict rules=stringent safety regulations【严格的安全法规】

check qualifications=verify professional credentials【核实专业资质】

make people follow rules=ensure compliance with safety standards【确保遵守安全标准】

personal autonomy【个人自主权】

强调成年人有权在充分了解风险的前提下作出自己的决定。

personal freedom=individual liberty【个人自由】

the right to make decisions=individual autonomy【个人自主权】

take responsibility=assume responsibility for one’s choices【为自己的选择承担责任】

understand the risks=make an informed decision【在充分了解信息后作出决定】

protect people=safeguard participants and bystanders【保护参与者和旁观者】

benefits of sports运动的好处

improve physical fitness=enhance physical conditioning【增强身体素质】

become more confident=develop greater self-confidence【培养更强的自信心】

overcome difficulties=push beyond one’s perceived limitations【突破自己原有的能力边界】

deal with pressure=develop resilience under pressure【培养应对压力的韧性】

learn new skills=cultivate technical competence【培养专业技能】

思路拓展

观点一：为什么有人支持禁止极限运动？

分论点一：极限运动可能导致严重伤亡。

Extreme sports can expose participants to substantial risks of severe injury or death, particularly when environmental conditions deteriorate or safety procedures are neglected.

极限运动可能使参与者面临严重受伤甚至死亡的风险，尤其是在环境条件恶化或安全操作程序被忽视的情况下。

论证拓展：

高空跳伞可能受到天气、设备故障和操作失误的影响；高山攀岩则可能因落石、突发风暴或保护装备失效而造成严重后果。与普通运动相比，一些极限运动发生事故后留给参与者的反应时间更短，救援也更加困难。

分论点二：极限运动事故可能给公共资源带来负担。

Preventable accidents may place considerable pressure on emergency services and public healthcare systems, particularly when rescue operations require specialist personnel and equipment.

本可避免的事故可能给紧急救援服务和公共医疗体系带来巨大压力，尤其是在救援需要专业人员和特殊设备的情况下。

论证拓展：

如果参与者在偏远山区发生事故，救援人员可能需要使用直升机、专业绳索设备或高山救援技术。此类行动不仅耗费资源，也可能使救援人员自身陷入危险。

注意：这并不意味着所有参与者都会浪费公共资源，而是说明不负责任的风险行为可能产生超出个人范围的社会成本。

观点二：为什么不应该全面禁止极限运动？

分论点一：成年人应当享有合理的个人选择权。

In a free society, competent adults should be entitled to make informed decisions about activities that primarily affect their own safety.

在自由社会中，具备相应判断能力的成年人应当有权在充分了解风险的情况下，决定是否参加主要影响自身安全的活动。

论证拓展：

人们在日常生活中也会从事具有一定风险的活动，例如滑雪、骑行和登山。如果政府仅仅因为某项活动存在危险就全面禁止它，就可能过度干预个人自由。因此，合理的政策应当区分自愿承担风险与危害他人的行为。

分论点二：合理监管比全面禁止更有效。

A well-designed regulatory framework can reduce avoidable risks without eliminating the legitimate benefits of extreme sports.

完善的监管体系能够降低可避免的风险，同时保留极限运动本身具有的合理价值。

论证拓展：

政府可以要求跳伞机构聘用持证教练，定期检查设备，并根据天气情况决定是否开展活动。攀岩场所则可以实施安全培训、装备检查和难度分级制度。通过这些措施，参与者能够更充分地了解风险，运营机构也必须承担相应责任。

分论点三：极限运动能够培养心理韧性和自我管理能力。

Under appropriate supervision, extreme sports can foster resilience, disciplined decision-making and a stronger sense of personal accomplishment.

在适当的监督下，极限运动能够培养心理韧性、严谨的决策能力以及更强烈的个人成就感。

论证拓展：

例如，初学者在专业教练指导下进行室内攀岩，需要学习路线判断、身体控制和安全绳使用。这一过程不仅能够增强体能，还能帮助参与者在压力环境中保持冷静。由此可见，运动的价值并不只在于刺激感，也在于技能和自我管理能力的培养。

高分范文

It is sometimes argued that dangerous extreme sports, such as skydiving and rock-climbing, should be prohibited to prevent serious accidents. Although these activities undoubtedly entail considerable risks , I disagree with a blanket ban【一刀切的全面禁令】. In my view, governments should prioritise stringent safety regulations over outright prohibition , thereby safeguarding participants【保障参与者的安全】without unnecessarily restricting individual liberty【限制个人自由】.

Admittedly, the case for prohibiting extreme sports is not without merit. Such activities can expose participants to potentially life-threatening incidents, while accidents in remote or inaccessible locations may require costly and hazardous rescue operations . For instance, a climber caught in a sudden snowstorm on a high-altitude mountain may need to be evacuated by specialist rescue teams , placing both the injured individual and rescuers in considerable danger . Moreover, when accidents result from inadequate preparation or defective equipment , the consequences may extend beyond the participants themselves【超出参与者自身的范围】, placing additional pressure on emergency services and public healthcare systems. These concerns justify robust intervention【证明有力的干预措施具有合理性】, but they do not necessarily warrant a universal prohibition【足以证明全面禁令的合理性】.

More importantly, a blanket ban would constitute a disproportionate infringement on personal autonomy. Competent adults should generally be entitled to make informed decisions about activities whose risks they understand and voluntarily accept, provided that they do not endanger others. Furthermore, extreme sports can offer benefits beyond physical recreation, including enhanced self-discipline【更强的自律能力】, psychological resilience【心理韧性】 and a sense of personal achievement【个人成就感】. Consider novice climbers who undertake supervised indoor climbing courses: by learning to assess routes, operate safety equipment and respond calmly to challenging situations, they develop practical skills while managing risk in a controlled environment【在可控环境中管理风险】. Prohibiting such activities merely because more hazardous forms exist would overlook the distinction between manageable risks and reckless conduct.

A more effective approach would be to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework【建立全面的监管框架】. Governments could require operators to obtain licences【取得经营许可证】, mandate regular equipment inspections, enforce professional training standards and suspend activities during dangerous weather conditions【在天气危险时暂停活动】. Participants should also receive clear information about potential hazards before giving informed consent【作出知情同意】. For example, licensed skydiving centres could be required to verify equipment safety【核实设备的安全性】and assess weather conditions【评估天气状况】 before each jump. Such measures would reduce preventable accidents  while preserving the legitimate freedom to participate in challenging pursuits.

In conclusion, although the dangers associated with extreme sports warrant serious attention a blanket ban would be excessive【过度的】. Strict regulation, professional supervision and individual accountability offer a more proportionate means of protecting public safety while respecting personal freedom【尊重个人自由】.

高级词汇搭配

风险与安全

entail considerable risks【伴随着相当大的风险】

pose a serious threat to human life【对人的生命构成严重威胁】

sustain life-threatening injuries【遭受危及生命的伤害】

mitigate foreseeable risks【降低可预见的风险】

minimise preventable accidents【尽可能减少本可避免的事故】

adhere to established safety protocols【遵守既定的安全操作规程】

权利与自由

infringe upon individual liberty【侵犯个人自由】

respect personal autonomy【尊重个人自主权】

exercise freedom of choice【行使选择自由】

assume responsibility for one's decisions【为自己的决定承担责任】

strike a balance between freedom and safety【在自由与安全之间取得平衡】

政府监管与社会责任

impose stringent safety requirements【实施严格的安全要求】

establish a comprehensive regulatory framework【建立全面的监管框架】

hold operators accountable for negligence【追究运营机构疏忽失职的责任】

allocate public resources efficiently【高效分配公共资源】

protect participants and bystanders alike【同时保护参与者与旁观者】

身心发展与个人成长

cultivate psychological resilience【培养心理韧性】

develop sound judgement under pressure【培养在压力下作出合理判断的能力】

push beyond perceived limitations【突破自我认知中的能力局限】

derive a sense of accomplishment【获得成就感】

pursue challenging but meaningful experiences【追求具有挑战性但有意义的体验】

同类话题拓展

Some people believe that individuals should be allowed to participate in any sport they choose, even if it involves serious risks. Others think that governments should restrict dangerous sports. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that governments should ban activities that pose a risk to human life, while others believe that people should be free to make their own decisions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people believe that taking risks is essential for young people to develop confidence and independence. Others think that young people should be encouraged to avoid risks. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people believe that governments should spend more money on preventing accidents and improving public safety rather than supporting recreational activities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that individuals should be responsible for the risks they take, while others believe that governments should protect people from dangerous activities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

2026年10月10日雅思写作真题解析

第二道

In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

真题解析

本题探讨少数人获得极高薪水究竟有利于国家发展，还是政府应当设定工资上限。支持高薪的一方认为，丰厚的经济回报能够激励人才创新、吸引国际精英并促进经济增长；支持限薪的一方则强调，过度的收入不平等可能加剧社会分化，使财富和机会集中于少数人手中。写作时，应分别论证两种观点，并明确区分工资限制与税收调节。较有说服力的立场是反对统一工资上限，同时主张政府通过累进税制和公平竞争机制，在保留人才激励的同时缩小不合理的收入差距。

关键词解析

earn extremely high salaries获得极高薪水

command exceptionally high remuneration【获得极高报酬】

receive disproportionately generous compensation【获得不成比例的高额薪酬】

limit salaries限制工资

impose a statutory salary cap【实施法定工资上限】

place a ceiling on executive pay【为高管薪酬设定上限】

encourage people to work hard

鼓励人们努力工作

provide powerful financial incentives【提供强有力的经济激励】

reward outstanding performance【奖励卓越表现】

attract talented people吸引优秀人才

attract and retain top-tier talent【吸引并留住顶尖人才】

strengthen a country's competitive edge【增强国家竞争优势】

the gap between rich and poor贫富差距

the widening income divide【不断扩大的收入鸿沟】

the concentration of wealth【财富集中】

make society fairer使社会更加公平

promote distributive justice【促进分配正义】

foster greater social mobility【促进更充分的社会流动】

government control政府管控

direct state intervention【国家直接干预】

market-based remuneration【以市场为基础的薪酬】

reduce inequality减少不平等

redistribute wealth through progressive taxation【通过累进税制重新分配财富】

narrow the socioeconomic divide【缩小社会经济差距】

思路拓展

观点一：少数人获得极高薪水对国家有利

核心论点：经济激励能够促进创新与生产力。

Exceptionally high salaries can serve as powerful financial incentives, encouraging individuals to develop scarce skills, undertake demanding responsibilities and generate greater economic value.

极高薪水能够提供强有力的经济激励，鼓励人们培养稀缺技能、承担艰巨责任并创造更大的经济价值。

举例论证：

例如，人工智能和半导体行业需要大量高水平研发人才。如果企业无法提供具有竞争力的薪酬，部分顶尖工程师可能转而加入海外企业或创业公司，从而削弱本国的技术创新能力。

高级表达：

scarce expertise【稀缺的专业知识】

technological breakthroughs【技术突破】

enhance national competitiveness【增强国家竞争力】

attract and retain highly skilled professionals【吸引并留住高技能专业人才】

观点二：政府应限制过高薪酬

核心论点：过度的收入差距可能损害社会公平。

When executive compensation becomes disproportionate to ordinary workers' earnings, it can exacerbate income inequality and undermine public confidence in the fairness of the economic system.

当高管薪酬与普通劳动者收入严重失衡时，这种现象可能加剧收入不平等，并削弱公众对经济制度公平性的信心。

举例论证：

例如，一家企业即使利润增长，也可能将大部分新增收益用于高管奖金，而一线员工的工资长期停滞。假如这种做法普遍存在，普通劳动者可能难以分享经济增长的成果，进而产生被忽视或受到不公平对待的感受。

高级表达：

excessive executive remuneration【过高的高管薪酬】

an inequitable distribution of wealth【不公平的财富分配】

erode public trust【侵蚀公众信任】

equal access to essential services【平等获得基本公共服务的机会】

观点三：为什么反对统一工资上限？

核心论点：直接限薪可能产生意想不到的经济后果。

A universal salary cap could distort labour-market incentives, discourage exceptional performance and make it more difficult for domestic businesses to compete for international talent.

统一工资上限可能扭曲劳动力市场的激励机制，削弱卓越表现的动力，并使本国企业更难与国际竞争者争夺人才。

举例论证：

例如，如果某国对所有行业设定相同的工资上限，科技企业可能无法向稀缺的人工智能专家支付与国际市场相匹配的薪酬。这些专家可能选择到限制较少的国家工作，导致本国人才储备和技术研发能力受到影响。

更合理的替代政策：

政府可以通过累进税制调节高收入群体的税后收入，并加强对薪酬披露、利益冲突和不公平竞争的监管，而不是规定所有行业都不得超过同一工资标准。

高级表达：

unintended economic consequences【意想不到的经济后果】

distort market incentives【扭曲市场激励机制】

progressive income taxation【累进所得税制】

transparent remuneration practices【透明的薪酬制度】

高分范文

In many countries, a small proportion of the population earns exceptionally high remuneration【极高的薪酬】. While some argue that this benefits the nation by helping to stimulate economic growth【刺激经济增长】, others believe that governments should impose an upper limit on earnings. Although excessive income disparities deserve serious attention, I believe that a universal salary cap would be counterproductive and that targeted taxation and effective regulation offer a more balanced solution.

On the one hand, exceptionally high salaries can encourage innovation and enhance national competitiveness【增强国家竞争力】. When individuals are rewarded in proportion to their expertise, responsibilities and contributions, they have a stronger incentive to acquire specialised skills and pursue demanding professional goals. This is particularly important in industries such as artificial intelligence and biotechnology, where technological breakthroughs【技术突破】depend heavily on researchers with specialised expertise【专业领域的专门知识】. For example, technology companies often offer substantial compensation packages to attract specialists capable of developing advanced AI systems. If governments arbitrarily restricted such earnings, domestic firms might struggle to recruit international talent, potentially allowing competing economies to gain a technological advantage. Furthermore, high earners contribute considerable tax revenue, which can help finance public services and infrastructure, provided that the tax system is appropriately structured.

On the other hand, allowing a small elite to accumulate disproportionately high incomes【不成比例的高额收入】can undermine social cohesion【损害社会凝聚力】. When executive pay rises dramatically while ordinary employees experience stagnant wages【停滞不前的工资】, the benefits of economic growth become increasingly concentrated among those who are already affluent. This disparity may prevent lower-income households from accessing quality education, adequate housing and essential healthcare, thereby reinforcing intergenerational disadvantage【加剧代际劣势】. For instance, if a corporation distributes substantial bonuses to senior executives while freezing frontline workers' wages, employees may reasonably question whether the organisation's rewards reflect their collective contribution. Such perceptions can erode workplace morale and public confidence in the fairness of the economic system. It is therefore understandable that some people advocate government intervention to curb excessive remuneration.

Nevertheless, imposing a universal salary ceiling is not the most effective remedy. Different occupations require different levels of expertise and responsibility, and an inflexible cap could discourage innovation or drive skilled professionals to countries offering more competitive compensation. Instead, governments should adopt progressive taxation, strengthen transparency requirements for executive pay and enforce regulations against exploitative business practices. These measures would allow individuals to benefit from exceptional performance while helping to reconcile individual incentives with the broader interests of society【协调个人激励与社会整体利益】.

In conclusion, although exceptionally high salaries can widen social inequalities, imposing a blanket wage ceiling risks undermining economic dynamism. A combination of fair taxation, transparent remuneration and robust regulation is a more sustainable way to ensure that individual ambition is rewarded while the benefits of prosperity are more widely shared.

高级词汇搭配

exceptionally high remuneration【极高的薪酬】

stimulate economic growth【刺激经济增长】

enhance national competitiveness【增强国家竞争力】

technological breakthroughs【技术突破】

specialised expertise【专业领域的专门知识】

disproportionately high incomes【不成比例的高额收入】

undermine social cohesion【损害社会凝聚力】

stagnant wages【停滞不前的工资】

reinforce intergenerational disadvantage【加剧代际劣势】

progressive taxation【累进税制】

transparency requirements for executive pay【高管薪酬透明度要求】

exploitative business practices【剥削性商业行为】

erode public confidence【削弱公众信心】

undermine economic dynamism【削弱经济活力】

reconcile individual incentives with the broader interests of society【协调个人激励与社会整体利益】

同类话题拓展

Some people believe that company executives are paid too much in comparison with ordinary workers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that people who earn more money should pay a higher proportion of their income in tax. Others believe that everyone should pay the same tax rate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In many countries, the gap between rich and poor is increasing. What problems does this cause, and what measures can be taken to address them?

Some people believe that a person's salary is the most important factor when choosing a job. Others think that job satisfaction and work-life balance are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think governments should control the salaries paid by private companies, while others believe that wages should be determined by the market. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.