乐于分享
好东西不私藏

AI演员的利与弊–英语外刊选读22

AI演员的利与弊–英语外刊选读22

字数:500

难度指数:

 2025, a company called Xicolia, which specialises in Artificial Intelligence (AI), unveiled an AI actress named Tilly Nowood.Artificial intelligence is a computer system that learns from experience and performs tasks that usually require human intelligence.- Xicolia claims that Tilly could be the next big star and that several talent agents—who represent actors and help them get cast in films—want to sign her up. Artificial intelligence can be useful for everyday life, from digital assistants like Alexa and Siri to medical screenings for diseases like cancer. However, some people are not happy about one new invention in particular: an actor named Tilly Nowood. Although Tilly hasn’t been cast in any big movies or TV shows yet, the company that created her says she’d be a star. A creation that’s not actually a human can act and be believable on screen convey human emotions and that’s rare really. Many people aren’t convinced. There are also concerns that AI actors could start taking over real actors’ jobs in films and TV shows. What do you think? Is the use of AI actors a good id

What you need to know

– In 2025, a company called Xicolia, which specialises in Artificial Intelligence (AI) talent, unveiled an AI actress named Tilly Nowood.

– Artificial intelligence is a computer system that learns from experience and performs tasks that usually require human intelligence.

– Xicolia claims that Tilly could be the next big star and that several talent agents—who represent actors and help them get cast in films—want to sign her up.

点击展开翻译

你需要了解的信息

– 2025年,一家名为Xicolia的人工智能(AI)人才公司,推出了一位名叫蒂莉·诺伍德的AI女演员。

– 人工智能是一种能从经验中学习、执行通常需要人类智力完成的任务的计算机系统。

– Xicolia称,蒂莉可能会成为下一个巨星,已有几位艺人经纪(代表演员、帮他们争取电影角色的人)想签下她。

A computer-generated character

Artificial intelligence can be useful for everyday life, from digital assistants like Alexa and Siri to medical screenings for diseases like cancer. However, some people are not happy about one new invention in particular: an actor named Tilly Nowood. Although Tilly hasn’t been cast in any big movies or TV shows yet, the company that created her says she’d be a star. An emotion that’s not really convey human emotions and be believable on screen. Many people aren’t convinced. There are also concerns that AI actors could start taking over real actors’ jobs in films and TV shows. What do you think? Is the use of AI actors a good idea?

点击展开翻译

人工智能在日常生活中很实用:从Alexa、Siri这类数字助手,到癌症等疾病的医学筛查,都能用到。但有些人对一项新发明不太满意——就是名叫蒂莉·诺伍德的演员。虽然蒂莉还没出演过任何大片或电视剧,但创造她的公司称她会成为明星。不过她无法真正传递人类情感,在屏幕上缺乏真实感。很多人对此并不信服,还有人担心AI演员会开始抢走影视行业中真人演员的工作。你怎么看?使用AI演员是个好主意吗?

YES—they free up more money

Making movies and TV shows can be really expensive. Using AI actors should save companies a lot of money. They wouldn’t have to pay expensive Hollywood stars, and as a result they could make more shows or films. Plus, AI-generated actors wouldn’t get tired or sick and could do things that real people can’t do without the risk of getting injured. In fact, they could do all their own stunts and pretty much anything that a director wants in a production, allowing filmmakers to create their movies to look like a certain character, which would also be made with fever limits. An AI actor could be great for historical dramas about real people.

点击展开翻译

支持——能省出更多资金

拍电影和电视剧成本很高。用AI演员能帮公司省下一大笔钱:不用支付好莱坞巨星的天价片酬,因此能制作更多作品。另外,AI生成的演员不会累、不会生病,还能完成真人做起来有受伤风险的动作。实际上,它们能自己完成所有特技,几乎能满足导演在制作中的任何需求,让电影人能更自由地创作——比如让角色符合特定形象。AI演员也很适合关于真实人物的历史剧。

NO—real people need those jobs

Even though AI actors exist, it doesn’t mean we should use them. Real actors have natural talent and work hard to learn their craft, yet AI companies have also been accused of taking advantage of real actors. According to the actors’ union SAG-AFTRA, tech companies train AI performers using the work of real professional actors who didn’t give permission or get paid for it. Plus, AI actors look a little weird. It’s unsettling to feel them, knowing they’re not real and don’t feel real human emotions. That spoils the experience of watching a movie or show.

点击展开翻译

反对——真人需要这些工作

虽然AI演员存在,但不代表我们就该用它们。真人演员有天赋,还会刻苦打磨演技,但AI公司却被指控利用真人演员。据演员工会SAG-AFTRA称,科技公司用真人职业演员的作品训练AI表演者,却不经过本人许可,也不支付报酬。另外,AI演员看起来有点怪异,知道它们不是真人、没有真实的人类情感,会让人看的时候很别扭——这会毁掉观影或看剧的体验。

YES- Three reasons the use of AI actors is a good idea
1. They’re cheaper than big stars. That would free up more money to make more films.
2. Filmmakers could do much more with AI actors, who will never get tired or sick and could do all their own stunts.
3. They could be made to look and sound exactly right for a particular role—for example, a real person from history.

点击展开翻译

支持:使用AI演员是好主意的三个理由: 1. 它们比大牌明星便宜,能省出更多钱来拍更多电影。2. 电影人用AI演员能做更多事:AI演员不会累、不会生病,还能自己完成所有特技动作。3. 它们可以被打造成完全符合特定角色的样貌和声音——比如历史上的真实人物。
1. 它们比大牌明星便宜,能省出更多钱来拍更多电影。
2. 电影人用AI演员能做更多事:AI演员不会累、不会生病,还能自己完成所有特技动作。
3. 它们可以被打造成完全符合特定角色的样貌和声音——比如历史上的真实人物。
2. 电影人用AI演员能做更多事:AI演员不会累、不会生病,还能自己完成所有特技动作。
3.它们可以被打造成完全符合特定角色的样貌和声音——比如历史上的真实人物。
1. 它们比大牌明星便宜,能省出更多钱来拍更多电影。
2. 电影人用AI演员能做更多事:AI演员不会累、不会生病,还能自己完成所有特技动作。
3. 支持:使用AI演员是好1. 它们比大牌明星便宜,能省出更多钱来拍更多电影。2. 电影人用AI演员能做更多事:AI演员不会累、不会生病,还能自己完成所有特技动作。3. 它们可以被打造成完全符合特定角色的样貌和声音——比如历史上的真实人物。们可以被打造成完全符合特定角色的样貌和声音——比如历史上的真实人物。

NO Three reasons the use of AI actors is not a good idea

1. Computer-generated actors could take jobs from real, professional actors.

2. Tech companies might use the work of real actors to train AI actors without permission or pay. That’s not fair.

3. Watching a computer-generated actor wouldn’t feel real. Human emotions are not real and don’t feel human. Knowing they’re not real underling to watch them, knowing that spoils the experience of watching a movie or show.

点击展开翻译

反对:使用AI演员不是好主意的三个理由

1. 电脑生成的演员会抢走真人职业演员的工作。

2. 科技公司可能会未经许可、不支付报酬,就用真人演员的作品来训练AI演员。这不公平。

3. 看电脑生成的演员会缺乏真实感:它们没有真实的人类情感,也不会让人觉得“像人”。知道它们不是真人,会破坏观影或看剧的体验。

外教和中教1对1课程目前正常招生,欢迎添加下方微信号咨询详情。

(原创内容,转载请注明出处。欢迎朋友圈扩散,欢迎关注公众号“加州奇迹英语在家学”;或微信号了解更多信息。)

本站作品均采用知识共享署名-非商业性使用-相同方式共享 4.0进行许可,资源收集于网络仅供用于学习和交流,本站一切资源不代表本站立场,我们尊重软件和教程作者的版权,如有不妥请联系本站处理!

 沪ICP备2023009708号

© 2017-2026 夜雨聆风   | sitemap | 网站地图