夜雨聆风学习资料网

ARTICLE · 1056502

考研英语真题全解|2016T1 -T2英语二词句篇

考研英语真题全解|2016T1 -T2英语二词句篇

学习建议目录 

单词视频朗读

单词展示

单词测试

篇章阅读

完成阅读

精细分析

单词视频朗读

关注
重播 分享

单词展示

单词测试:https://kaoshi.wjx.top/vm/YaxNBXY.aspx# 

篇章阅读

Text 1

①It’s true that high-school coding classes aren’t essential for learning computer science in college. ②Students without experience can catch up after a few introductory courses, said Tom Cortina, the assistant dean at Carnegie Mellon’s School of Computer Science.

①However, Cortina said, early exposure is beneficial. ②When younger kids learn computer science, they learn that it’s not just a confusing, endless string of letters and numbers—but a tool to build apps, or create artwork, or test hypotheses. ③It’s not as hard for them to transform their thought processes as it is for older students. ④Breaking down problems into bite-sized chunks and using code to solve them becomes normal. ⑤Giving more children this training could increase the number of people interested in the field and help fill the jobs gap, Cortina said.

①Students also benefit from learning something about coding before they get to college, where introductory computer-science classes are packed to the brim, which can drive the less-experienced or -determined students away.

①The Flatiron School, where people pay to learn programming, started as one of the many coding bootcamps that’s become popular for adults looking for a career change. ①The high-schoolers get the same curriculum, but “we try to gear lessons toward things they’re interested in,” said Victoria Friedman, an instructor. ③For instance, one of the apps the students are developing suggests movies based on your mood.

①The students in the Flatiron class probably won’t drop out of high school and build the next Facebook. ②Programming languages have a quick turnover, so the “Ruby on Rails” language they learned may not even be relevant by the time they enter the job market. ③But the skills they learn—how to think logically through a problem and organize the results—apply to any coding language, said Deborah Seehorn, an education consultant for the state of North Carolina.

①Indeed, the Flatiron students might not go into IT at all. ②But creating a future army of coders is not the sole purpose of the classes. ③These kids are going to be surrounded by computers—in their pockets, in their offices, in their homes—for the rest of their lives. ④The younger they learn how computers think, how to coax the machine into producing what they want—the earlier they learn that they have the power to do that—the better.

完成阅读:

21. Cortina holds that early exposure to computer science makes it easier to____.

A. complete future job training

B. remodel the way of thinking

C. formulate logical hypotheses

D. perfect artwork production

22. In delivering lessons for high-schoolers, Flatiron has considered their____.

A. experience

B. interest

C. career prospects

D. academic backgrounds

23. Deborah Seehorn believes that the skills learned at Flatiron will____.

A. help students learn other computer languages

B. have to be upgraded when new technologies come

C. need improving when students look for jobs

D. enable students to make big quick money

24. According to the last paragraph, Flatiron students are expected to____.

A. bring forth innovative computer technologies

B. stay longer in the information technology industry

C. become better prepared for the digitalized world

D. compete with a future army of programmers

25. The word “coax” (Para.6) is closest in meaning to____.

A. persuade

B. frighten

C. misguide

D. challenge

精细分析:https://kaoshi.wjx.top/vm/OGZQ4Cw.aspx# 

学习自用,侵删

————2016年真题全解——

单词视频朗读

关注
重播 分享

单词展示

2016T2P1 Biologists 

n. 生物学家

2016T2P1 estimate

v. 估计

2016T2P1 lesser prairie chickens 

n. 小草原鸡(一种鸟类)

2016T2P1 stretching grasslands 

n. 广袤的草原

2016T2P1 landscape

n. 风景,景观

2016T2P1 midwestern

adj. 中西部的

2016T2P1 United States

adj. 西南部的

2016T2P1 United States 

n. 美国

2016T2P1 remain

v. 剩下

2016T2P1 occupying 

v. 占据(occupy 的现在分词)

2016T2P1 historic range 

n. 历史范围

2016T2P1 species 

n. 物种

2016T2P2 crash 

n. 崩溃,暴跌

2016T2P2 major reason 

n. 主要原因

2016T2P2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 

n. 美国鱼类及野生动物管理局

2016T2P2 formally list 

v. 正式列出

2016T2P2 threatened 

adj. 受威胁的

2016T2P2 desperate situation 

n. 绝望的境地

2016T2P2 environmentalists 

n. 环保主义者

2016T2P2 disappointed 

adj. 失望的

2016T2P2 designate 

v. 指定

2016T2P2 endangered 

adj. 濒危的

2016T2P2 federal officials 

n. 联邦官员

2016T2P2 regulatory power 

n. 监管权力

2016T2P2 crack down on 

v. 严厉打击

2016T2P2 threats 

n. 威胁

2016T2P2 flexibility 

n. 灵活性

2016T2P2 conservation approaches 

n. 保护方法

2016T2P2 less confrontational 

adj. 较少对抗性的

2016T2P2 collaborations 

n. 合作

2016T2P2 western state governments 

n. 西部州政府

2016T2P2 uneasy 

adj. 不安的

2016T2P2 private landowners 

n. 私人土地所有者

2016T2P2 estimated 

adj. 估计的

2016T2P2 habitat 

n. 栖息地

2016T2P3 plan 

n. 计划

2016T2P3 agency 

n. 机构

2016T2P3 prosecute 

v. 起诉

2016T2P3 landowners 

n. 土地所有者

2016T2P3 businesses 

n. 商业

2016T2P3 unintentionally 

adv. 无意地

2016T2P3 kill 

v. 杀死

2016T2P3 harm 

v. 伤害

2016T2P3 disturb 

v. 干扰

2016T2P3 signed 

v. 签署(sign 的过去式)

2016T2P3 management plan 

n. 管理计划

2016T2P3 restore 

v. 恢复

2016T2P3 negotiated 

v. 谈判(negotiate 的过去分词)

2016T2P3 requires 

v. 要求

2016T2P3 damage 

v. 损害

2016T2P3 operations 

n. 运营

2016T2P3 pay into 

v. 支付到

2016T2P3 fund 

n. 基金

2016T2P3 replace 

v. 替换

2016T2P3 destroyed 

v. 被毁(destroy 的过去分词)

2016T2P3 suitable 

adj. 合适的

2016T2P3 compensate 

v. 补偿

2016T2P3 interim goal 

n. 临时目标

2016T2P3 restoring 

 v. 恢复(restore 的现在分词)

2016T2P3 populations 

n. 种群

2016T2P3 annual average 

n. 年均

2016T2P3 monitoring 

n. 监控

2016T2P3 progress 

n. 进展

2016T2P3 coalition 

n. 联盟

2016T2P3 state agencies 

n. 州级机构

2016T2P3 driver’s seat 

n. 主导地位

2016T2P4 rhetoric 

n. 修辞,花言巧语

2016T2P4 Congress members 

n. 国会议员

2016T2P4 block 

v. 阻止

2016T2P4 dozen 

n. 一打,十二个

2016T2P4 industry groups 

n. 行业团体

2016T2P4 challenge 

v. 挑战

2016T2P4 federal court 

n. 联邦法院

2016T2P4 argue 

v. 争论,主张

2016T2P4 goes too far 

v. 走得太远,过于极端

2016T2P4 environmentalists 

n. 环保主义者

2016T2P4 doesn't go far enough 

v. 做得不够,不够深入

2016T2P4 federal government 

n. 联邦政府

2016T2P4 responsibility 

n. 责任

2016T2P4 managing 

v. 管理(manage 的现在分词)

2016T2P4 extinction 

n. 灭绝

2016T2P4 biologist 

n. 生物学家

Text 2

Biologists estimate that as many as 2 million lesser prairie chickensa kind of bird living on stretching grasslands—once lent red to the often grey landscape of the midwestern and southwestern United States. But just some 22,000 birds remain today, occupying about 16% of the species’ historic range.

The crash was a major reason the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWSdecided to formally list the bird as threatened. “The lesser prairie chicken is in a desperate situation,” said USFWS Director Daniel Ashe. Some environmentalists, however, were disappointed. They had pushed the agency to designate the bird as “endangered,” a status that gives federal officials greater regulatory power to crack down on threats. But Ashe and others argued that the “threatened” tag gave the federal government flexibility to try out new, potentially less confrontational conservation approaches. In particular, they called for forging closer collaborations with western state governments, which are often uneasy with federal action, and with the private landowners who control an estimated 95% of the prairie chicken’s habitat.

Under the plan, for example, the agency said it would not prosecute landowners or businesses that unintentionally kill, harm, or disturb the bird, as long as they had signed a range-wide management plan to restore prairie chicken habitat. Negotiated by USFWS and the states, the plan requires individuals and businesses that damage habitat as part of their operations to pay into a fund to replace every acre destroyed with 2 new acres of suitable habitat. The fund will also be used to compensate landowners who set aside habitat. USFWS also set an interim goal of restoring prairie chicken populations to an annual average of 67,000 birds over the next 10 years. And it gives the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (WAFWA), a coalition of state agencies, the job of monitoring progress. Overall, the idea is to let “states” remain in the driver’s seat for managing the species,” Ashe said.

Not everyone buys the win-win rhetoric. Some Congress members are trying to block the plan, and at least a dozen industry groups, four states, and three environmental groups are challenging it in federal court. Not surprisingly, industry groups and states generally argue it goes too far; environmentalists say it doesn’t go far enough “The federal government is giving responsibility for managing the bird to the same industries that are pushing it to extinction,” says biologist Jay Lininger.

26. The major reason for listing the lesser prairie chicken as threatened is____.

A. its drastically decreased population

B. the underestimate of the grassland acreage

C. a desperate appeal from some biologists

D. the insistence of private landowners

27. The “threatened” tag disappointed some environmentalists in that it_____.

A. was a give-in to governmental pressure

B. would involve fewer agencies in action

C. granted less federal regulatory power

D. went against conservation policies

28. It can be learned from Paragraph 3 that unintentional harm-doers will not be prosecuted if they_____.

A. agree to pay a sum for compensation

B. volunteer to set up an equally big habitat

C. offer to support the WAFWA monitoring job

D. promise to raise funds for USFWS operations

29. According to Ashe, the leading role in managing the species is______.

A. the federal government

B. the wildlife agencies

C. the landowners

D. the states

30. Jay Lininger would most likely support_______.

A. industry groups

B. the win-win rhetoric

C. environmental groups

D. the plan under challenge

扫码进行单词篇章测试

相关学习资料